[Kaslin]

Since the 1979 revolution, blaming The Great Satan for Iran's woes international and internal has been the dictatorship's permanent information warfare gambit.

Thanks to that Peanut farmer from Georgia

[DoughtyOne]

I was just going to say...

Thanks for beating me to it.

Jimmy Carter and Barack Hussein Obama, the two gifts that
just keep on giving...

[Gen.Blather]

“Thanks to that Peanut farmer from Georgia”

Unlike Obama and Clinton, I think Carter was honest. But he was an ideolog, like Obama and Clinton and that damage alone was enough to infect the world with a Jihadist philosophy that was basically dormant since the end of WWI. Add the Clinton crime family and the Obama Jihadist supporter and they, together, made the world a much less safe place for humanity. (While enriching themselves to a ridiculous degree.) Imagine a Biden presidency, which would be owned by the Chinese and whoever is backing the others who paid huge sums to Hunter, who was essentially a procurer. How safe would the free world be under them?

[LRoggy]

Too simplistic . . he certainly accelerated the Shah’s downfall by meeting with Khomeini in Paris and blessing him, but the Shah was not exactly a wallflower himself and the Iranian people were eventually going to go this way anyhow.

Carter was as much into human rights as Reagan (back when BOTH parties actually cared about that) and the likely support of the Shah would have made this a lot bloodier than the 50 hostages, with the likely same result. Reagan spooked the Mullahs to the point they released the hostages pretty much on his Inauguration Day and Reagan wes kind enough to let Carter greet them at Andrews Air Base.

Obama was really the goat in this story. And he should face eternal shame in the history books for this stupidity, with Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett right behind him.

[chuckee]

The ayotollah’s ammo supply is down to 17 tree branches. After the troops beat themselves with them, they make a run at the enemy with them