Kayleigh McEnany should inform the assembled White House press corps that these three Nobel Peace Prize nominations mean that Trump will now be qualified to be crowned "King of America" for life.
Posted on 09/28/2020 4:41:19 PM PDT by Kaslin
A group of Australian law professors have given President Trump his third Nobel Peace Prize nomination for his commitment to ending foreign wars.
"The Trump Doctrine is something extraordinary, as so many things that Donald Trump does," law professor David Flint explained on Sky News. "He is guided by two things, which seem to be absent from so many politicians. He has firstly common sense and he is only guided by a national interest, and therefore, in our circumstances, an interest in the Western alliance. What he has done with the Trump Doctrine is that he has decided that he would no longer have America involved in endless wars, wars which achieve nothing, but the killing of thousands of young Americans and enormous debts imposed on America."
Trump nominated for Nobel Peace Prize by Australian law professors for doctrine against endless wars https://t.co/b7AWExuUbs— Newsweek (@Newsweek) September 28, 2020
The professors also gave the president recognition for his recent signing of the Abraham Accords, a peace agreement between Israel, Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates. The deal will establish normalized relations and "reciprocal embassies" in each country. Ahead of the signing ceremony, Trump said that a handful of other countries are expected to join the peace deal in the coming weeks.
.@SecPompeo on the Abraham Accords: We have decreased risk in the Middle East. We’ve created more opportunities for peace. We’re still going to work on creating more stability and more peace in the Middle East. pic.twitter.com/4dPlCMfVav— Department of State (@StateDept) September 27, 2020
Trump was previously nominated by Christian Tybring-Gjedde, a member of the Norwegian Parliament, for doing "more trying to create peace between nations than most other Peace Prize nominees." Swedish Parliament member Magnus Jacobsson nominated him a second time for his leadership in the accord between Kosovo, Serbia, and Israel.
It appears that some courageous individuals, from three different nations, are attempting to challenge that.
Only with total f@#$wits and mass murderers and liars, and they only get one nomination. Nominating someone who actually deserves it? For even one? Let alone three? Check outside for flying pigs.
There are thumbs on scales and some very deserving people should get a fair shot.
...but when barack hussein obama wins with NO ACCOMPLISHMENTS, the prize devolves into is a meaningless political weapon.
There are some great leaders in this world who deserve awards for keeping us safe and securing peace under the most difficult circumsances.
NO DOUBT
The pendulum of history, in every aspect, constantly swings back and forth, and always has.
At least this is an attempt to take the prize back from the state that you describe.
I hope so and God Bless you Jamestown.
Kinda unusual for an impeached president!
You, too, Eddie!
Really well worth a listen to hear this Law Professor speak so highly and specifically about our Pres.
Australian Sky News Link: https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6195238657001
They all wish they had a Trump, too.
"I want peace, that's why I ran for president, to keep the blood of our young men and women from being spilled by war mongering profiteers like you, Joe."
For all we know, Biden has also been nominated this year. If so, I wouldn't put it past the Nobel Prize committee to give it to him in hopes of aiding his chances in the election.
That would be an excellent point to make.
I think Dylan had the same take...
Lousy post.
There were suggestions after the Revolution that we should establish a monarchy, and make Washington ‘king’.
He eschewed all of that; and went back to his farm.
https://www.heritage.org/commentary/the-man-who-would-not-be-king
https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/man-who-would-not-be-king
I guess I don’t, when it comes to issues that are crucial to our continuance as the Republic of the United States.
I especially don’t like playing around, on a site like this, with silly ideas that enemies are entirely ready to pounce upon. Journalists today don’t have any morals - they just want something to seize upon; and they especially enjoy demonizing sites like this.
They’ve been suggesting for weeks that the President will refuse to concede, if he loses the election. Your post was potentially assisting that false narrative; and that’s why I didn’t like it.
If you think it’s ‘OK’ to offer grist for their mill, then keep on doing it. I find certain jokes unwise, right now; and feel that they reflect poorly on the site, and all of us.
Put that in your crack pipe, LIEberals!
You should watch the Sky News Australia interview with one of the law professors who nominated him. I think you will be pleasantly surprised at how deeply impressed this man is with President Trump and his success as a world leader. https://youtu.be/OxGT_cQXpj8
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.