Posted on 09/25/2020 3:17:10 PM PDT by fishtank
“Even God contemplated if the decision to have kids was a good idea. . .”what was I thinking?”. . .Hey, I can relate. . .but at the end of the day.. .love conquers all doubts, pains and disappointments. . and, as we know. . God IS love.”
So much love that he killed most of his kids.
Princeton went apostate at least a century ago... see
Christianity and Liberalism - J. Gresham Machen (Intro / Chapter 1 of 7)
I did answer & I’m not twisting scripture to try to sound smart. Go ahead and give the passage of scripture you’re using then give the context & meaning of the passage.
It should be easy for someone as enlightened as you. (God fears only you!) Lol
But you can’t. All you have is
bullshit faux intelligence & pride.
Make sure you quote the correct scripture...
And you did not answer the question does God regret making you? What are you afraid of? Perhaps you can ask Him on judgement day.
We’re done.
“Go ahead and give the passage of scripture you’re using ...”
The Lord regretted that he had made human beings on the earth, and his heart was deeply troubled. 7 So the Lord said, “I will wipe from the face of the earth the human race I have created—and with them the animals, the birds and the creatures that move along the ground—for I regret that I have made them.”
LSU down to Miss State
Miss State 34 LSU 24
37-34
44-34
Costello 623 yds passing
At the website Dr. Walt Brown gives a 6 min introductory video for his hydroplate theory - click on CSC homepage. He also has a newer video approx 11 min.
There are also 7 videos approx 45 min each that describe the hydroplate theory narrated by Bryan Nickel.
Nice copying. 2-3 verses. Wow very impressed!. But it explains nothing. And still waiting for your enlightened expert fact filled description & meaning of the passage.
What? No answer? No answer as to why God regrets making you???
All you did was copy a couple verses. But you still cannot speak to its meaning.
False flag. Try again. Game over.
No shit. Brilliantly stating the obvious. Nice of you to take the time to post it twice. Watch your obsession.
Still cannot tell us why God regrets making you.
But bless your heart.
I believe that theory has been all but abandoned. This was written way back in 2007:
"The collision has to be implausibly gentle. You practically need someone to hold a Mars-sized object just above Earth and drop it, to avoid messing up Earth's orbit." [Peter Noerdlinger quoted in, "Did the new moon lose its iron heart?" New Scientist, Jan 17, 2007]
That theory was discussed on Free Republic in 2007:
Note: the publication I cited is dated a week earlier than the date on that post.
Anyway, after NASA reexamined the moon rocks and found water, this story came out:
"For a long time, scientists have thought"that the moon is completely dry," says Erik Hauri, a geochemist at the Carnegie Institution's Department of Terrestrial Magnetism in Washington, D.C."
"They believed there couldn't be water on the moon because of how it was formed. According to the "giant impact" theory, the moon was born 4.5 billion years ago when an object the size of Mars came hurtling out of the void and smacked the young Earth."
"This impact melted both objects and scattered a cloud of debris around the Earth. That debris became the moon — and the new moon was a hot ocean of magma…"
"This is a problem for the giant impact theory, says Hauri. "It's hard to imagine a scenario in which a giant impact melts, completely, the moon, and at the same time allows it to hold onto its water," he says. "That's a really, really difficult knot to untie."
"Others agree that the discovery raises questions. "It's obviously a very new result to say that the moon might have had a significant amount of water right after it formed," says Ben Bussey, with the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab in Laurel, Md."
[Nell Greenfieldboyce, "Glass Beads From Moon Hint Of Watery Past." National Public Radio (NPR), July 9, 2008]
Link: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92383117
This video excerpt explains that theory, and why it is untenable:
What You Aren't Being Told About Astronomy Vol I - Our Created Solar System
Three previous theories were mentioned at the 37m 26s mark.
The bottom line is, scientists haven't a clue how the moon was formed.
Mr. Kalamata
And when the astronauts landed on the Moon it was as hard as rock, but that's what happens to cheese when you leave it out.
(Ripped off from Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy)
LOL! That makes sense.
Really? This science is deeper and way more comprehensive than anything one could study in any other science book
And it’s a free online book - Center for Scientific Creation
https://www.creationscience.com/
I actually tried to teach this at my church back in 2011 and 2012, without these videos explaining it on a whiteboard was truly challenging. Dr. Walt Brown gives a short intro and Bryan Nickel goes deep into the hydroplate theory, careful if you’re tired he speaks in a monotone but the explanations and video graphics are very good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.