This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Sounds kinda, I don’t know, all infringee and stuff.
U.S. District Judge Kimberly Mueller denied a review of a 2017 federal appeals court decision that upheld the law, which bans carrying concealed weapons in most urban areas and permits open-carry of weapons only if someone believes that a person is in immediate danger and law enforcement has failed to respond, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.
I looked it up. Kimmy Mueller was appointed by Obama. Nothing more needs to be said.
An armed society is a polite society. If this thing holds, a few places are gonna get a lot less polite.
BLM is proud to announce our new spinoff organization Cracker Mobs Matter! With CMM you can rest assured that we stand with the safety of those exercising their fundamental human right to burn down your black neighborhood without fear of reprisal from Uncle Toms or others who might resist them. Yes, CMM is a new mostly peaceful quality organization from the people who brought you mostly still standing cities!
If you’re in ‘immediate danger’ do you have to tell the attacker ‘hang on a minute... let me wait to see if law enforcement is gonna respond’ before you’re good with this ruling?
Surely BLM and Antifa will obey. Or they may just show up at the judges house. Would be a shame.
“...other states have seen counter-demonstrators armed with weapons.”
So, AP never saw all the gun-toting BLM and antifa demonstrators carrying, aiming at bystanders and passing cars, shooting in the air?
Enemedia at work. Our MSM are now blatant Domestic Enemies, Enemies Within, Enemies of America.
They must be stopped.
This ruling infringes our right to BEAR arms as perotecred by the 2ndA and incorporated against the States by SCOTUS in McDonald vs Chicago 2010.
We don’t require the states permission to exercise our right. I hope this can be appealed.
Why would the court’s ruling on a CA law be binding in those other states?
Maybe only if they pass a law similar to CA’a law being ruled on?
Meanwhile, the original Mercury News article is not totally correct in their wordings of current CA law. So don’t come to any conclusions from their article.
Problem is that most people (cops included) do not know current CA gun law. Gun law changes continually, is written confusingly, is interpreted liberally, is applied capriciously, and is confused with everyday speech terms by normal citizens.
Oh I hope I did not offend any citizens; hard to find a normal citizen in CA.
Most every gun owner has a different interpretation of CA gun law, especially when new laws are proposed or reviewed like this one. So I stay under the radar and wait, and don’t assume anything.
However, know that CA Dem legislators are working hard to ‘eliminate the loopholes’ in current law. Might as well define each gun and ammo as a “Loophole”, and eliminate that! That is their unimpeded goal.
This is a very misleading article, from the AP as usual, as she did not uphold the law, she denied a review. In other words, she didn’t do anything, she passed the buck to a case in Hawaii and wouldn’t work the case in California. So, she didn’t uphold anything but invited further court cases already on the dockets. Lies, lies, lies...
rwood
I ear arms because it is part of my Religious faith and belief that I must do so, in order to stand approved before my Maker, and this position is supported by the enshrinement of this right to bear arms, as specified within the United States Constitution.
Death Traitors!
“Bear” is not just a furry critter in the woods.
Patriots are reminded that the states have given Congress the express 14th Amendment (14A) power to make penal laws that discourage state actors from abridging constitutionally enumerated rights, 1st and 2nd Amendment protections in this example.
From the 14th Amendment:
"Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
In fact, the congressional record shows that Rep. John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 above, had included 2A when he read the Bill of Rights as main examples of constitutionally enumerated protections that 14A applies to the states.
John Bingham, Congressional Globe. (See 2nd Amendment (Article II) about in middle of 2nd column.)
H O W E V E R…
We are still stuck with a worthless, corrupt Congress left over from the lawless Obama Administration that will predictably munch popcorn while watching CNN show reluctant CA law enforcement officers arresting Californians for bearing their firearms, violating their 1st and 2nd Amendment-protected rights by doing so imo.
The remedy for constitutionally failed federal and state governments…
Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government desperate Democrats home in November!
Supporting pro-2A PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a "third term" in office imo.
Also regarding 14A:
UC Berkeley relatively recently had to pay compensation under 14A concerning the abridgment of 1st Amendment free speech protections.
UC Berkeley settles landmark free speech lawsuit, will pay $70,000 to conservative group
Problem is that taxpayers, not Berkeley offending state actors, will probably pay compensation.
Patriots who value their constitutionally enumerated protections of freedom of religious expression and free speech, consider that Acts 22:25-29 shows that Apostle Paul got out of a flogging by claiming his Roman citizenship.
... the law, which bans carrying concealed weapons in most urban areas and permits open-carry of weapons only if someone believes that a person is in immediate danger and law enforcement has failed to respond..
Which seems to be the case at every democrat sponsored riot, doesn’t it?
And of course everyone knows well in advance and with 100% accuracy when these conditions apply and cannot be second-guessed by prosecutors months later. Ahem.