If the judge can act as the prosecutor, then why can’t the defendant act as the judge and “rule” that “the defendant” is innocent?
The DOJ has concluded that Flynn is innocent, so why shouldn’t Flynn just “rule” that the DOJ’s conclusion is a “verdict” and then get on with his life?
This so-called “justice system” has devolved into a “legal system” that is so corrupt that a trial is just a formality not a test of innocence as intended.