[rintintin]

I’m with Trump on the issue of the Iraq war. Your position is on the same side as Bill Kristol. That really ought to give you something to think about.

I’m going to leave it at that. Hope the rest of your Sunday is pleasant.

[DJ MacWoW]

I’m with Trump on the issue of the Iraq war. Your position is on the same side as Bill Kristol.

Apparently you can't read. Or else you lack comprehension. Maybe both. Regardless, you're late to the party and trying to tell everyone what WE missed. Cute. Noob.

Hopefully, someday you'll get the "schooling" you need.

[rlmorel]

Iraq had chemical and nerve weapons. That is not in dispute, because we know that Iraq used them not only against the Iranians, but against their own citizens in the years prior to 2003.

Which of these options in your opinion explains why chemical or biological agents were never used against our troops:

1. Saddam Hussein used ALL of the weapons against the Iranians and his own population, leaving him with none by the time the invasion took place.

2. Saddam Hussein had them but wouldn't use them because it would have given the USA and allies the right to take extreme measures in destroying his regime.

3. Saddam Hussein had chemical and biological agents and wanted to use them, but waited too long and his regime collapsed before he could use them as a desperation move.

4. Saddam Hussein had them and wanted to use them but his military refused.

5. Saddam Hussein destroyed them all in order to comply with sanctions.

6. Saddam Hussein kept them, but they were unusable by the time the invasion came.

7. Saddam Hussein transported them to Syria for safe keeping in the hope he could retain power and reclaim them later.

Just curious-what is your opinion?