Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/03/2020 7:06:21 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Kaslin
During the war, a million dead japs were not worth a single American life, with no war, that equation maybe slightly over weighted.

Smoke'm if you gotte'm.

We had nukes and used them to save American lives, the only ones we were concerned about.

PERIOD.

63 posted on 08/03/2020 7:33:07 AM PDT by USS Alaska (NUKE THE MOOSELIMB, TERRORISTS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

**The atomic attacks by the United States Army Air Force on the two Japanese cities undeniably were horrific tragedies.***

Bunkum. The only reason people boo-hoo about the A-bombs is it took only two bombs to kill so many people.

Had the US sent 100 planes with 40,000 pounds each of conventional bombs and killed just as many nothing would be said about it.

In fact, the US DID send out several bombing raids AFTER the A-bomb blasts, killing thousands and no one cries or even remembers about it.


65 posted on 08/03/2020 7:35:13 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

WW2 - justified or not?

Just because the big bad AR-15 bombs are scary doesn’t make them unique in war time compared to all the other destructive forces that were used (mustard gas, machine guns, tanks, firebombs, etc;).

Let alone the handwringing over modern weapons of war - cluster bombs, cruise missiles and depleted uranium ammunition (which is, oddly, considered just as dangerous as nuclear weapons)

Should they ever be used again? Dear God, I hope not and that’s probably the best reason for using them originally.

Lest we forget - Hitler was close on the heels of developing the atomic bombs as well AND had the V2 rockets to deliver them to the US and the USSR was right behind us.

If you wanna play armchair philosopher then you have to ask the question “is any war” justified? And that includes “good wars” like the civil war which is now being erased from US history as an inconvenient truth.

The fact of the matter is that humanity is violent, as any protests in Seattle and Portland and now Austin will readily demonstrate. Would BLM justify its use of a nuclear bomb?

You betcha.


67 posted on 08/03/2020 7:37:52 AM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

A description of what an invasion of Japan actually would have entailed can be seen in Post 27 of http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3777953/posts


68 posted on 08/03/2020 7:40:33 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The attack on Pearl Harbor.......

....what is to debate?

The Atomic bomb has not been used since!
....so yes, it was a good deterrent.


69 posted on 08/03/2020 7:42:31 AM PDT by Guenevere (Press On!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I live in Oak Ridge, so this subject is a perennial favorite.
I suspect the Chinese at the time were happy with it, after the Rape of Nanjing, an episode of mass murder and mass rape committed by Imperial Japanese troops against the residents of Nanjing (Nanking), then the capital of China, civilians and disarmed combatants who numbered an estimated 40,000 to over 300,000 were murdered

I refuse to judge the actions of that war, using 20:20 hindsight

73 posted on 08/03/2020 7:59:48 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Oh its that time of year again? When we do the annual hand wringing on the anniversary for the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima?


74 posted on 08/03/2020 8:01:41 AM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

As one who was around when the bomb was dropped, I can state unequivocally that it was an extremely popular act with the American people.


77 posted on 08/03/2020 8:11:15 AM PDT by Salvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Where’s the “Not this Shit Again” guy?


78 posted on 08/03/2020 8:11:45 AM PDT by LeonardFMason (Lou Dobbs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Given what happened on Okinawa (and what could have happened on Kyushu had Operation Olympic went ahead), we may have saved at minimum 450,000-500,000 lives of American service personnel and maybe up to 15 million Japanese.
79 posted on 08/03/2020 8:12:53 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Without a doubt justified. One, the two atomic bombs ended the war, saving many lives that were being lost day-to-day. Secondly and more importantly, their use made the invasion of Japan unnecessary. An invasion that would have resulted in casualties in the hundreds of thousands for The Allies, and millions for the Japanese.


80 posted on 08/03/2020 8:13:38 AM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The atomic attacks by the United States Army Air Force on the two Japanese cities undeniably were horrific tragedies.

Was not the rape of Nanking a horrific tragedy?! And many other Japanese atrocities throughout the war? Let's not get carried away here.

81 posted on 08/03/2020 8:15:31 AM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If the Japs had the bomb, would they have hesitated to use it on San Francisco or LA?

Absolutely not.


83 posted on 08/03/2020 8:18:52 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (China kills almost 700,000 and the sheeple sleep. Cops kill one person, and cities burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Is is August already? Time for this again?

Leaving aside the expected US casualties from a US invasion of the Home Islands, the Japanese Military was preparing a full mobilization of the civilian population. It would have been necessary for the US soldiers to kill millions and millions of militarized civilians.

The death toll of the bombings, while horrific, was a small fraction of the inevitable death toll amongst the Japanese civilian population if an invasion of the Home Islands had become necessary.


84 posted on 08/03/2020 8:19:28 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (It's Winnie-the-Flu / Put the blame where it belongs / On Winnie-the-Poo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

They have been justified because they HAPPENED! Time has justified them.

There are no do overs with nuclear bombs.

Justified or not, the point is moot.

THEY attacked US. They LOST we WON!

Just had an epiphany!

So, like 75 years ago we dropped the bombs. More than 100 years before that, we had slavery.

Do the Japanese HATE US? Are Japanese people rioting and looting and burning down our cities? Are Japanese Americans persecuted and incarcerated disproportionately ( Blacks are incarcerated disproportionately because they commit CRIMES disproportionately) ?

NO! Why is that. Seems like the Japanese people could understandably hold a grudge.

BECAUSE IT WAS SEVENTY-FIVE YEARS AGO!

GET OVER IT!


87 posted on 08/03/2020 8:24:21 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Paul Tibbetts had no regrets and never doubted his mission the rest of his life. He also held no great hatred for the Japanese - he drove a Toyota later in his life.

His response to all the second-guessing and armchair generalship: They never had their balls on the anvil.

90 posted on 08/03/2020 8:25:23 AM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Japan had already set in motion a plan to execute every prisoner of war, about 130,000 men and women, on August 22. Had we not used the atomic bomb, we would have lost those 130,000, because Japan would not have surrendered until much later. Most people aren’t aware of Japan’s final strategy plan, Operation Ketsu-Go. Even at the beginning of August 1945 Japan’s leadership thought they could crush an invasion force and stop the allies from conquering the home islands. It was a delusional plan when you consider the Soviet factor, but even at the beginning of August the government of Japan was desperately trying to keep the Soviets out of the war via diplomatic channels. But any way you look at it, those two bombs ended the war, saved 130,000 POW lives and kept the Soviet Union from occupying most of Japan. So was it worth it? You bet it was.


94 posted on 08/03/2020 8:33:26 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (In time of peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Hell Yes!


100 posted on 08/03/2020 8:51:02 AM PDT by spincaster (ust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The easiest call ever. Totally justified.

And remember the Japanese military was the ISIS of its time. A uniformed mob of torture killers.


101 posted on 08/03/2020 8:56:08 AM PDT by Dagnabitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Still discussing this after all these years. They made the decision based on what they knew, being intently influenced by what they had just gone through on Iwo Jima and Okinawa.


104 posted on 08/03/2020 9:04:42 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson