[norcal joe]

This article is a week old. And it talks about an interview that occurred a week before that. And it has nothing new.

[House Atreides]

“This article is a week old. And it talks about an interview that occurred a week before that. And it has nothing new.“
*************************************************
Yep. And it has been superseded by events. Judge Sullivan has requested a en banc hearing with the full Appeals Court. That request is pending.

[freepersup]

Yet- you find the time to make a disparaging comment, to the benefit of no one.

Where would Free Republic be without it’s thread cops?

I thank the poster for the information, as I have been in the mountains without service.

Post away! Repeatedly!

[A strike]

“This article is a week old.”

Your ‘point’ ?

[TXnMA]

"This article is a week old. And it talks about an interview that occurred a week before that. And it has nothing new."

Nice to know that there's at least one FReeper who has so much free time and is so up-to-date that he can scoff at an interview that will go down in history as one of the clearest and most authoritative overviews of the Flynn case! </SARCASM>

TXnMA
  

[Newbomb Turk]

This article is a week old. And it talks about an interview that occurred a week before that. And it has nothing new.

Yet here you are.