Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

1) I think Trump wins the pop vote. When that happens, you’ll see the lefties rescind & repeal these “compact” votes faster than Newsome can lock down a healthy city.

2) The “compact” is meaningless until 279 electoral votes’ worth of states sign it. But even then, it means nothing until/unless actually enacted. (The legal principle of “moot-ness,” i.e., you can’t challenge a law until there is a real harm-—it’s the reason the USSC refused to hear the NYC gun case, because it was moot. NYC repealed it, so no one actually suffered a harm).

The Court will NOT act on hypothetical harms. So a case against this will not go anywhere until someone loses an election in which one person wins the popular vote, loses a “compact” state, has the compact put in force, and a legal challenge is issued. One would hope this would be expedited and settled as was Bush v. Gore before the electors are counted.

So don’t hold your breath waiting for a court challenge, and don’t worry about the “compact” states until their number reaches 279 worth of states.


15 posted on 07/15/2020 8:50:12 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: LS

Thanks, Larry. Good synopsis.

I want Trump to take the popular vote.

These popular vote compacts are like little kids that didn’t win the game and demanded to change the rules. I grew up with a bunch of siblings and know their next claim after Trump wins the popular vote is that we cheated somehow.


16 posted on 07/15/2020 8:56:04 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm Up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson