---------------
1. An absurd NR editorial. The entire Mueller investigation was bogus, from his appointment to his outrageous report. Yes, Stone was convicted. Only convicted people receive commutations or pardons.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) July 13, 2020
2. And the jury foreman was a political hack who should never have sat in that courtroom. The Obama judge has been awful. And not just in Stone’s case. This commutation is defensible. It is merited for the sound reasons the president stated.— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) July 13, 2020
3. Moreover, compared to the serious criminals and terrorists Obama and Clinton let free, the offenses in Stone’s case are small potatoes. Indeed, they’re rarely even charged. And Stone intends to appeal his conviction. As I said, an absurd NR editorial.https://t.co/9Lp3uSIwFU— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) July 13, 2020
Unmitigated, Pinko Bull$hit.
Typical tripe and spoiled haggis from National Lampoon, oops, I shoulda said National Review.
That rag is a remedy for the Great Toilet Paper shortage of 2020.
I let them go when Buckley died.
Nor are they as sleazy as Kevin D Williamson, Jay Nordlinger, or Rich Lowry….
I dropped my subscription, years ago, when the editors were gushing over Pierre Delicto, er, I mean “Myth Romney”.
If commutation can’t be used to right an obvious political prosecution, of what use is it?
Same people who published the infamous “Against Trump” issue.
A few of those people did successfully remedy their rectal-cranial inversions.
Why don’t the just call themselves The New Republic now - they have the same initials so they wouldn’t have to change the letterheads or anything...
Andrew Kavlan at the Daily Wire summed it up best: “Roger Stone won’t go to prison for covering up a crime that never happened during an investigation that never should have begun.”
Clinton’s pardon of Susan Rosenberg, Weather Underground bomber and now on BLM fundraising arm, Now THAT that is something worthy of embarrassment and regret. Who would post this stupid article?
How many times did NR condemn 0bama for commuting the sentences of 1,927 people? Was there even one time?
Another reason to ban National Review posting on FR.
Does anyone with a measurable IQ actually subscribe to, not to mention work for, that rag?
Ah, the National Review just can’t help itself. What did Stone even do, other than not cooperate with a witch hunt?
FNR.
NR IS INFESTED WITH NEVER TRUMPERS.
The National Review isn’t what it used to be.
There’s Another Republican Group Supporting Biden—Except It’s The Same Old Never Trump Names.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3864549/posts
They pretty much throw their whole argument away in the first few paragraphs, by acknowledgingly this is traditional and lawful.