Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Owen
You don’t include samples in a death calculation who are not vulnerable to death. The young essentially aren’t.

Of course you do.
The young and everybody else have been included in the death rate calculation from the get go.
Now that the death rate has been found to be equal to or even less than the common flu, you come up with this total nonsense?
Go peddle your garbage at DU.

19 posted on 07/07/2020 9:14:03 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: SmokingJoe

Dood, why would you include non vulnerable samples in a calculation of death vulnerability? And you really should check join dates before lashing out.

When you compute national pregnancy rates, you don’t include men in the calculation. That’s just bizarre.

If you want to know how many people over 65 die of ALL causes, you don’t include 20 year olds. Because they aren’t relevant to the calculation.

That is true of this disease. It’s a disease of old age. Why would you include the young in calculations about a disease of old age.


21 posted on 07/07/2020 9:18:42 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson