Posted on 07/06/2020 12:44:17 PM PDT by rintintin
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) torched former Ambassador Nikki Haley on Friday, saying that she is opposed to combating big tech tyranny, Breitbart News has learned exclusively.
Breitbart News obtained a copy of Gaetzs latest Hot Takes with Matt Gaetz podcast episode, in which he slams Haleys critique calling for regulations that would curb big tech censorship of conservative and alternative voices.
Haley wrote on Thursday that, although she decries censorship of conservatives, regulating big tech would go too far in the other direction.
Censorship by tech companies, esp censorship of conservative opinions, violates the spirit of the law & the 1st Amendment, Haley claimed. But more regulation would go too far in the other direction, putting bureaucrats & lawyers in control of what gets said online. Either way, free speech loses:
@NikkiHaley Censorship by tech companies, esp censorship of conservative opinions,violates the spirit of the law & the 1st Amendment.But more regulation would go too far in the other direction,putting bureaucrats & lawyers in control of what gets said online. Either way, free speech loses.
Gaetz said that Haleys reluctance to fight censorship puts her in big techs camp.
He said, On this podcast, I have chronicled the tyranny of big tech and the impact on our ability to have fair debate and discussion about critical issues. And, if youre ever wondering whos on the other side, particularly in the Republican Party, I guess look no further than former Amb. Nikki Haley.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Gaetz Hot Takes short podcasts are very good!
I prefer her birth name of Nimrata Randhawa.
She’s a fraud - GWB in a skirt.
Doesn’t she work for MicroSoft?
She did not do much as Gov. of SC.
another ex-elected official thinking what she says matters.
GWB in skirt
Shes not stupid, like Bush. She is the poster girl for a RINO Bushite backstabber.
In other words, big tech is afraid of the athletes who tell the owners of various teams etc. what to do...the owners are scared to death of these meal tickets.....what happens if We The People withdraw our support? Respect the flag you athletes live under, respect the laws of the Constitution Big guys, We other Americans do. Respect our Country that is so good to all of you...or we're gone.
If it weren’t for Big Tech, there would be very few Red Dot Indians in the USA. Nicky owes it to Big Tech.
Nimrata Randhawa started this frenzy of history erasing.
She has a PAC, Stand for America.
Do NOT give her money, she failed to stand for America when she had the chance.
Out history means nothing to her because it is not her history.
She was born an Indian national from two Indian national parents.
Nikki Haley=John McLame in a skirt, John “the Walrus” Bolton wearing lipstick, and GW with a bra.
But she’s not really smart either, is she?
She’s got an undergraduate accounting degree from Clemson. Clearly will do whatever the Deep State wants. Seems more ambitious than anything. Her ghostwriter/speech writer is Jonah Goldberg’s wife—which tells you all you need to know.
Nikki wants to run for President. She probably wants tech money to fund the campaign
Nimrata Randhawa is as ineligible as Micro Rubio, Rafael Cruz, Piyush Jindal and George P. Bush.
ALL inherited foreign nationality from foreign national parent(s).
NONE is naturally an American because they were also born something else.
Only when you are SOLELY American are you a natural born citizen.
How do you listen to those? Forgive my ignorance but I just listen to SiriusXM all day and don’t know much about podcasts.
There are apps for Android and Apple, and things like iHeartRadio and Google Play. They usually can be streamed from a website too.
Don’t forget, Kamala Harris is also ineligible.
Yep and Tammy Duckworth as well.
She’s an Indian of course she likes big tech.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.