[Alberta's Child]

The point being that we are supposed to have moved into an era in which countries don’t acquire land by force. Because the moment that happens, then it is legit to punish the aggressor and break his country up, as was done to the Axis powers after WWII.

You must be joking. There isn’t a country in the world over the last 50 years that has been more aggressive against sovereign nations than the United States. Does that mean we are due to be punished and broken up?

Wait — don’t bother answering that. I think I see the answer on TV every evening.

[Zhang Fei]

[You must be joking. There isn’t a country in the world over the last 50 years that has been more aggressive against sovereign nations than the United States. Does that mean we are due to be punished and broken up? ]

---

Which countries has the US annexed in the past 50 years? I don’t understand why so-called libertarians and paleos keep ripping off fraudulent Soviet talking points. I understand it takes time to do your own historical research and to actually think things through rather than regurgitate Howard Zinn’s narratives, but still ...

[ARW]

Well, if we can’t buy them nor acquire by force then are today’s political boundaries forever? And what makes the 2020 map any more “correct” than the one from 1920 especially if the 2020 one has historical anomalies?