Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Really bad idea. Boston tried private fire companies over a century ago. You can still see some plaques on old home telling which fire company to contact in case of fire. The problem was that, but the time someone fired out who to contact, the building was in ashes. Why would private police be any different. Indeed, it would likely be worse.


6 posted on 06/18/2020 8:27:48 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: econjack
What's happening here is that the distinction between "security guards" and "law enforcement officers" has become blurred. They aren't the same, and yet the police are being asked to take on roles as security guards.

This idea that Americans have come to take for granted -- that we need police officers “to serve and protect” us -- has no place in a free nation. This country was built by people who were perfectly capable of PROTECTING THEMSELVES.

The purpose of “law enforcement” isn’t to protect the citizens at large. It’s to ensure that accused criminals are apprehended and protected so they can be subject to legitimate trials instead of hunted down and given “justice” by armed vigilantes.

We -- including conservatives -- have forgotten this fundamental aspect of the U.S. legal system over the years. As a result, we no longer think of the police as law enforcement officers and instead see them as nothing more than armed security guards doing a job that we are too lazy and irresponsible to do ourselves.

14 posted on 06/18/2020 8:39:23 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("We're human beings ... we're not f#%&ing animals." -- Dennis Rodman, 6/1/2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson