[Kaisersrsic]

The Appeals Court is going to believe that Judge Sullivan will dismiss the case despite the arguments made by the amicus brief because he has done it in the past in a case called Saena Tech. I did a "deep dive" here: Deep Dive on Sullivan and Gleeson

Powell should have focused more on arguments for removing Sullivan from this case because both his appointing Gleeson after the Washington Post article and the brief Judge Sullivan's lawyer filed with the Court of Appeals demonstrate he is not impartial.

[romanesq]

Sidney Powell did point to seeing Sullivan recused and that would have been ignored by the judge panel anyway.

[romanesq]

“The Appeals Court is going to believe that Judge Sullivan will dismiss the case..”

They’re trying to give him the hint but I don’t think Sullivan hears or cares.
Deep State stooge.