Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trebb

Exactly. 20% in a valid medical study is very significant.


19 posted on 06/05/2020 3:46:09 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$

They do miss the point and why couldn’t they complete the study? Does it shorten the duration of symptoms and contagious time? That is where it might be the most effective besides the 20% increase in protection. Why can’t we get a serious nonbias study in the middle of a pandemic? Why should I hate the orange man lead such a childish reaction and cause poor science?

I am really disappointed in medical science (even more so, if possible).


21 posted on 06/05/2020 6:13:55 AM PDT by BushCountry (thinks he needs a gal whose name doesn't end in ".jpg")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson