Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Who bats next? I think it's the appeals court which is now free to rule on the petitions by Sydney Powell to force the end to this case, and remove Sullivan from it.
1 posted on 06/01/2020 1:46:59 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Jack Black
At this point, they can't let Flynn go. It will just lead to more protesting rioting. /s
2 posted on 06/01/2020 1:49:31 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Sullivan passing the buck?


3 posted on 06/01/2020 1:49:41 PM PDT by Dacula
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

This guy can’t be that stupid-—he is being forced to do this.

Or, yes he has all along been a tool of these type DS’ers.

Beyond silly response, which the Appeals Court cannot accept and will overturn, because you can’t be judge and Prosecutor in US-— not yet anyway like some French magistrate.


4 posted on 06/01/2020 1:50:53 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

So, what did the NSA ‘contractor’ give the DNC on the judge?


5 posted on 06/01/2020 1:52:21 PM PDT by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
Here it is from a source other than #fakenews CNN: Michael Flynn Judge Just Told the D.C. Circuit Why He Refused to Immediately Dismiss Prosecution


6 posted on 06/01/2020 1:52:59 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

I’m not reading 46 pages of fluff


9 posted on 06/01/2020 1:53:44 PM PDT by dontreadthis (A TIMELINE OF TREASON on Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

The judge was personally ordered to respond. The judge didn’t even sign the response he had “his” attorney respond and sign it.

Who paid for this? Taxpayers?

The reply should be rejected and the judge ordered to appear and show cause why he should not personally be held in contempt.


13 posted on 06/01/2020 1:56:29 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Seditious Sullivan, UNCLE TOM to the CLOWNS and TERRORISTS,
has no excuse for violating the US Constitution and
the Supreme Court.

HE MUST BE Impeached and removed from the Bench
or the Courts will have the respect of the UN or FIB.


14 posted on 06/01/2020 1:57:08 PM PDT by Diogenesis ( WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

This is ONLY about delay. It is imperative that Flyy in kept from talking freely and has a cloud hanging over his head.


15 posted on 06/01/2020 1:57:20 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
DOJ was also invited by the appeals court to submit a brief by today.

I've been out of the loop today so I don't know if that already happened.

16 posted on 06/01/2020 1:58:11 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
Right out of the gate, there’s a problem with the introduction;

“It is unprecedented for an acting U.S. Attorney to contradict the solemn representations that career prosecutors made time and again, and undermine the district court’s legal and factual findings, in moving on his own to dismiss the charge years after two district Federal judges accepted the defendant’s plea.”

Yes, it’s unprecedented but the actual facts that have come to light are why the charges are being dismissed.

17 posted on 06/01/2020 1:58:37 PM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

The judge’s attorney put the best lipstick available on the pig.

But notice that he deviated from the procedures which the brief argues he had a right to employ. Then they argue that his approach was more moderate than what is permitted.

I don’t think anyone would have stopped the judge from ruling on the request before him. If he refused to dismiss then Flynn would appeal it.

What the judge actually did was to delay things and to set up a special procedure that seemed like he was acting out of anger rather than caution.


21 posted on 06/01/2020 2:01:00 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

His attorney also seemed to argue that he was being prevented from evaluating or investigating the case before him. But bringing in someone to make arguments for one side is not the same as asking the actual parties before him to give him facts.


22 posted on 06/01/2020 2:02:01 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Can’t wait to hear what Sidney Powell has to say.


24 posted on 06/01/2020 2:02:13 PM PDT by LoveMyFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
III. MANDAMUS IS NOT WARRANTED BECAUSE THIS COURT WOULD BENEFIT FROM JUDGE SULLIVAN'S CAREFUL EVALUATION OF THE CASE

That's it, in a nutshell.

-PJ

25 posted on 06/01/2020 2:05:06 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Back to the appeals court I assume. They requested the response.


26 posted on 06/01/2020 2:05:50 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

I’m not plowing through 46 pages of rationale. The upshot is, he’s not backing down, am I right?


28 posted on 06/01/2020 2:06:14 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Deep State desperate to keep the issue alive thru the election cycle.


36 posted on 06/01/2020 2:22:11 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

If you haven’t read it, basically the judge is claiming he just needed more time to evaluate the contempt citation he was contemplating. He did not argue the specific case law and legal precedents the court had listed in their ruling for judge Sullivan to explain his actions.

To put a fine pencil on it, Judge Sullivan (actually, his defense lawyer) simply argued that he needed more time to contemplate a contempt charge against General Flynn because Flynn had pled guilty in court proceedings presided over by two different judges.

The problem for Sullivan, besides not addressing at all the specific case law cited by the higher Court, is that he is arguing a contempt charge may be in order and essentially proposing that it may be appropriate for him to punish the victim of prosecutorial misconduct for allowing the obvious malfeasance of both the justice department and his original lawyers to effect his plea.

If that behavior is not egregious enough, if you remember, in his public statements to the defense he claimed that he was considering a perjury charge as well as the contempt charge... which reveals that his response to the court is disingenuous at best.

His response is weak and effectively bullshit and I fervently hope the court is not so corrupted by politics that the correct decision cannot be rendered.


37 posted on 06/01/2020 2:24:31 PM PDT by PresidentFelon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

More tip toe through the swamp tulips sophistry from the coupists simply because Gaspipe Barr refuses to drop the hammer on them. They need a political, criminal and civil court carpet bombing until they cry uncle. But that won’t be happening because the GOPe have no interest in supporting POTUS against the coup.


40 posted on 06/01/2020 2:27:08 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson