Have you read the laws? The dispute is about whether an organization is a publisher, or a platform supporting content distribution. If they censor and edit according to a bias or political viewpoint, they are then considered to be a publisher and are then liable for lawsuits. As simply a content distributor (like telephone companies supplying a platform for communications free of censoring), they have protections provided by government.
Twitter broke the rules, and are now considered a publisher open to lawsuits because of their interference as a content distributor. The market is controlling the media; President Trump's action reaffirms this.
How did the breakdown of Ma Bellwork out? They are stronger than ever.
Look at the big picture.
Let the market place decide.
JMHO
Thank you for the explanation