Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude
"It is highly unlikely that the officers INTENDED to kill Floyd in the act of subduing him. Intent plays crucially into any criminal charge."

Not the way you mean it. In this case it doesn't matter if they intended to kill him. The officer with a knee on his neck intended to put his knee on his neck. It wasn't an accident. The question is whether that act was legally justified.

146 posted on 05/28/2020 11:20:18 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: mlo; fwdude
"It is highly unlikely that the officers INTENDED to kill Floyd in the act of subduing him. Intent plays crucially into any criminal charge."

Not the way you mean it. In this case it doesn't matter if they intended to kill him. The officer with a knee on his neck intended to put his knee on his neck. It wasn't an accident. The question is whether that act was legally justified.

I said this on another thread.

I saw a pompous jerk of a Police Officer that refused to listen to imploring witnesses with the attitude of "you can't tell me what to do" and I'll kill the man just to prove I'm right.
If you'll forgive me for block quoting myself.   The Policeman was so intent on not giving any quarter to the bystanders and onlookers, that in the moment he did intend to kill George Floyd because no civilian rabble can tell me what to do.   The way he grabbed for his pepper spray while still putting pressure on the man's neck is a tell.

I had earlier assumed he was guilty of only manslaughter until I was able to watch the complete video with sound.

301 posted on 05/29/2020 11:56:04 AM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson