This is an incredibly slanted article, but I am wondering why Sullivan is doing this? Is he just seeking advice on options? Can he not write his won brief explaining his reasoning? Or is he in a bit of a bind because he has given a Flynn an opening to sue him for violating his civil rights, which would normally be extreme, but Sullivan’s express contempt for Flynn is extreme. Sullivan is obviously in on the deepstate cabal.
The Washington Post has an article but it’s behind a paywall.
I doubt it’s not slanted.
My guess is that the answer is in the Lawfare article. The article, what I could stomach, is signaling that the “persecution” of Judge Sullivan by Flynn is the next hoax. If Lawfare is in charge, it’s the next attempt to takedown a President.
It doesn’t have to be legal, make sense, or resemble reality. Look at Blasey-Ford. All they had to do was create a circus and 50% of the public goes one way and the other half goes the other.
To my mind, ego or politics is not a good enough explanation for Judge Sullivan to destroy his career and legacy. Only one reason makes sense: the Hammer owned fully by Obama, Holder and VJ.
Or is he in a bit of a bind because he has given Flynn an opening to sue him for violating his civil rights, which would normally be extreme, but Sullivan’s express contempt for Flynn is extreme. Sullivan is obviously in on the deepstate cabal
****************************
Yep, good facts.