We do, of course.
I’ve read the authority cited in the appellate order, Fokker Services (yes, that’s the name of the case.) yes, the facts are different but I see no reason why the Same law would not apply on these facts as well. Essentially the “leave of court” requirement is just a rubber stamp... prosecutorial decisions are vested in the prosecutor and the prosecutor only. The
Appellate court could not be signaling their intention to issue the writ more clearly. I think hiring an attorney is just for show, rather than blatantly turning tail and slinking into the shadows. If I’m wrong I’ll be prepared to eat the proverbial crow. But I’m not.
You sound confident. I’ll go with your answer.