[libertylover]

until the court issued its decision in the challenge to New York City’s ban on the transport of handguns outside the city.

Just how many microseconds does it take to realize that's blatantly unconstitutional?

[marktwain]

It was so obvious, once the case went to the Supreme Court, NYC and NYS changed laws to render the case moot.

Up until that time, they claimed, in court, up and down, it was obviously Constitutional and necessary!

[Gay State Conservative]

Just how many microseconds does it take to realize that's blatantly unconstitutional?

I've heard several state legislators...all Rats...say that when they're crafting state legislation they pay no attention to its fidelity to rights granted under the US Constitution.They say they let the courts deal with such issues.

As proof of that attitude there's a 2nd Amendment case from Massachusetts called "Caetano v Massachusetts" in which SCOTUS ruled 9-0 that the state law in question violated Caetano's 2nd Amendment rights.The author of the decision narrative (can't recall who) stated that the Massachusetts Supreme Court's ruling to uphold the law was "frivolous".I think that's the way SCOTUS says "ESAD"!