[Wuli]

“Non-partisan” voting should be ruled by the SCOTUS as denial of “freedom speech”. Where ever it is done, by the Dims being able to deny their labels, the voters are denied the clear knowledge of knowing what party they are voting for, and the candidate is deprived of the freedom to declare their party affiliation.

[Governor Dinwiddie]

Yes. So called “non-partisan” voting is in fact the most partisan voting possible. Essentially it is a Stalinisque scheme where you can vote for anyone you want as long as it's Stalin.