While the article raises some good points, it is a bit pessimistic for my taste, particularly regarding the President’s chances for re-election next November.
I’ve never heard of the author before, but he is, imho, 100% correct. This whole thing, particularly “social distancing,” which effectively gives the government authority to control all personal interactions, is really all about total control and forcible enactment of the “green agenda” which essentially means shutting down modern society. The fact that some one of the news channels had Greta Thunberg on as an “expert” shows you that they know perfectly well that the radical anti-population green agenda is behind this.
I wish Trump were leading more forcefully against this lockdown stuff, which unfortunately he empowered. He needs to challenge these dictators, insist on reopening the economy NOW (which also therefore means ending social distancing) and get rid of Fauci and the WH “guidelines” that are empowering the dictators. He also has to give more support to the good governors - attacking Kemp for “reopening early” was a terrible mistake. In other words, he needs to lead.
It may be too late, particularly since “social distancing” keeps people from meeting and working (not to mention praying) together. But make no mistake, while I don’t think the virus was released on purpose, the entire response to it is coordinated and is aimed at destroying modern free society (and in fact any kind of civil society at all, ) and eliminating human population.