As someone correctly pointed out, Obama let slip that Flynn committed perjury. Most people jumped on that commit, correctly pointing out the Flynn was not charged with perjury.
Well, surprise, surprise. As part of Sullivan’s order, he asked this judge to look into perjury charges on Flynn. The pretzel logic is this: When Flynn swore under oath that he lied to FBI, when in fact he didn’t lie, then he committed perjury.
This is clearly a coordinated effort that includes both Obama and Sullivan. Most likely the Lawfare group is leading this.
Yes the request that the extra judge argue that Flynn committed perjury and should be held in contempt is particularly outrageous. Flynn is trying to withdraw his guilty plea because he’s innocent. To find him guilty of a crime for having pled guilty when he was really innocent, is just twisted.
Once again, all kinds of technical “crimes” that no reasonable judge or prosecutor would ever pursue.
I wish Flynn well, but I've been saying for months that he's facing a serious legal quandary of his own making.
Isn’t every guilty plea bargain of an innocent person perjury by this logic?
The Founding Fathers would themselves personally tar and feather your ass!
Hi! We're from the Government and we'd like to ask you some questions.
Please be advised that if you answer these questions you will be charged with lying to Federal Authorities or perjury.
If you don't want to answer our questions you will be charged with Obstruction of Justice.
Your Choice.