Oy, such bizarre attempts at gaslighting:
“referring to accounts that don’t exist.”
Huh? Makes absolutely no sense at all, a patently goofy thing to pull outta the air. It’s really just babbling - seriously.
RE: the attempt to gaslight on Darwinism itself. Let me assist, but you really got to learn to think things through from now on and learn to do even the most basic and minimal of research (and being that the term is new to you, it’s yet another warning sign you might want to heed on your ability to think logically on the topic):
https://lmgtfy.com/?q=darwinism+dictionary&pp=1&iie=1
“I’m happy to be a Christian who sees no contradiction in following Jesus and considering ToE as accurate”
—
Uh-huh. Yeah, That’s why you became enraged (scroll back) and whined when it was pointed out you can’t be both a Darwinist and a Christian. I noticed the joy.
But therein is both your problem and the answer to it: you are not a Christian - that term has specific meaning to actual Christians. You are a Darwinist, hoping if you sprinkle a little Jesus on something it won’t be bad. You can claim again that doing just that assuages your guilt enough for you to go on. Good luck with keeping on with it.
Do you even read what you post? Most of your responses to me refer me back to previous comments of yours that have nothing to do with the question at hand.
It is you who has a real problem. I am most definitely a Christian and I have no issue with accepting ToE as entirely consistent with my (and anyone’s) Christian faith.
You, on the other hand, are of such weak faith that you persist in the denial that God is greater and more creative than you give Him credit for.
I suggest that you ponder that. You may find your faith strengthened in the process.
Exit question: Are Catholics Christians?