Posted on 05/04/2020 6:29:51 PM PDT by Mount Athos
The CIA Inspector General has taken more than a year to clear the release of a House Intelligence Committee report which contradicts the key conclusion of the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference in the 2016 election, according to the former chief of staff of the National Security Council.
The January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), prepared at the behest of President Barack Obama, claimed that Russia interfered in the presidential election in order to help candidate Donald Trump. The House Intelligence Committees public report (pdf) on Russia had already challenged the analytic tradecraft behind this central claim and suggested that the process of arriving at the assessment was not free of political interference.
A separate, classified report holed up at the office of the CIA Inspector General (IG) sheds damning light on the role then-CIA Director John Brennan played in the preparation of the report, former National Security Council Chief of Staff Fred Fleitz learned from House Intelligence Committee staff. A source familiar with the reports fate would not deny that the report went to the office of the CIA IG.
The report states that Brennan overruled agency analysts who wanted to include strong intelligence in the assessment to show that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted Hillary Clinton to win the election, Fleitz says, citing conversations with House Intelligence Committee staffers. Brennan had also rejected analysts who wanted to strike weak intelligence from the report which suggested that Russia favored Trump, Fleitz said.
So Brennan actually slanted this analysis, choosing anti-Trump intelligence and excluding anti-Clinton intelligence, Fleitz told The Epoch Times.
Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee issued the report in August 2018 and submitted it to the CIA IG in the fall of 2018 to be cleared for public release, according to Fleitz. The former NSC chief of staff says that only the limited circle of GOP members on the intelligence committee had read the report.
In the section of the House Intelligence Committees public Russia report that challenged the analytic tradecraft underlying the assessment that Russia favored Trump, the committee stated that it was planning additional action regarding this information in early spring 2018. A source familiar with the report told The Epoch Times that we did do a classified report on the ICA.
The existence of the House report on the ICA, which has not been previously reported, comes to light less one month after newly declassified documents revealed that the FBI was aware that a key part of the infamous Steele dossier could have been the product of disinformation by Russian intelligence services. The dossiera compilation of unverified allegations against Trumpplayed a key role in the FBIs decision to obtain a surveillance warrant to spy on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. The Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee funded the dossier.
A summary of the dossier was included in a top-secret attachment to the ICAAnnex A. The FBI pushed to include the dossier in the ICA, according to a Senate intelligence committee report (pdf) on the assessment released last month. The FBI told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) that they would have had a major problem if Annex A had not been included. Former FBI Director James Comey told the SSCI that he personally insisted that the dossier be included.
I insisted that we bring it to the party, and I was agnostic as to whether it was footnoted in the document itself, put as an annex, Comey told SSCI. I have some recollection of talking to John Brennan maybe at some point saying: I dont really care, but I think it is relevant and so ought to be part of the consideration.
The Senate reports conclusions about the ICA clash with those reportedly in the classified House report. The SSCI found no issues with the process that led to the issuance of the ICA and found no witnesses to support the claim that the process was politicized.
Every witness interviewed by the Committee stated that he or she saw no attempts or pressure to politicize the findings, the SSCI report states.
The CIA IG office is currently led by Acting Inspector General Christopher Sharpley, a holdover from the Obama administration who was reappointed by President Donald Trump. Sharpley withdrew his nomination after allegations surfaced that he misled the Senate about his awareness of whistleblower reprisal complaints against him.
Fleitz said he had personally reached out to Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grennell about releasing the House report. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not respond to a request for comment.
Let me guess, the CIA IG is a holdover from the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
The Senate report was written by Warner’s minions, Burr is just a figurehead chairman.
Tic Toc, Tic Toc, LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL Wake me up when someone is arrested. And I almost forgot: BOOM!
No need to guess
FTA
The CIA IG office is currently led by Acting Inspector General Christopher Sharpley, a holdover from the Obama administration who was reappointed by President Donald Trump.
The entire apparatus should have been scrubbed clean of holdovers.
Kind of flies in the face of the Republican led Senate intelligence committee report that just came out.
Well, this is the part that Gowdy (and other GOPers) kept promising us about investigations and soon to be real actions for two useless years.
GOP “leader” Paul Ryan was perfectly happy to let Trump stewing in the Russian Hoax pot for Jan 2017 - Jan 2019. ===> So that Ryan doesn’t really need to support Trump and his agenda.
No need to guess — the article calls the Acting IC IG an Obama holdover, reappointed by Trump. Why does he do this over and over again?
And tell me why Acting Inspector General Christopher Sharpley is working in the DJT administration? Why hasn’t one of the several Chiefs of Staff removed all Obama people?? This is crazy!!!
Brennan and Comey should be executed for their attempted coup.
because it helps to show how obama was in cahoots with the staffer, and now under Trump the same staffer gets exposed and it shows connection back to BO and his admin.
It doesn’t really show poorly on Trump, it shows how he is doing as God wants and hiring people, letting them have chance to do right or make amends for past wrongs, but instead they continue in their ways and God allows them to be exposed, which may wake upto truth, more USA citizens. God wins! Yea God!
And replaced with whom? Unlike Hillary, Donald Trump didn’t have hordes of psycho camp followers from which to choose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.