Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Hillary Clinton/Barack Obama Ticket To Replace Joe Biden?
thehill.com ^ | 05/02/20

Posted on 05/02/2020 7:33:52 PM PDT by Helicondelta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: Helicondelta

The only people talking about Hillary as nominee are conservatives trying to get clicks on their website. I know and have asked several Ds. NONE of them want her anywhere close to the D nomination.


101 posted on 05/03/2020 7:54:58 AM PDT by Pappy Smear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Why not Hillary/Bill then. Keep it in The Family.


102 posted on 05/03/2020 7:59:27 AM PDT by McGruff (Biden's still Hidin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Running?
Oh that is when you get on the tracks and run a 100 meter race.


103 posted on 05/03/2020 8:06:02 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
If anything like that should happen, it’s going to end up at the US Supreme Court. They can decide.

It's not going to happen so it will remain nothing but an topic for discussion.

People who write articles like this should spend less time on idiotic scenarios and more time on beating Biden. He's the one Trump will be running against.

104 posted on 05/03/2020 8:25:32 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
Obama is not eligible to be VEEP because he is no longer eligible to be POTUS

Of course he is (if he ever was in the first place).

He just can't be "elected" President again (and as I have posted elsewhere, that really depends on what XXII means by "elected").

105 posted on 05/03/2020 8:34:07 AM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
By that logic then someone who is 25 years old can't be elected vice-president but could be appointed vice-president.

Two different things.

Someone who is 25 is INELIGIBLE to the office of President, and therefore is also INELIGIBLE to the office of Vice President.

But the XXII Amendment does not make anyone ineligible to anything.

What it tries to do is to read 1944 Electoral College appointment practices into the Constitution.

The Constitution doesn't say anything about "running". It also doesn't say anything about political parties, primaries, nominations, conventions, being on the ballot or even the existence of ballots, Presidential elections (except for the electoral college, about which it says a lot). It says nothing about "calling states". It says nothing about "conceding" or "claiming victory".

All of those things are outside of the Constitutional process, are unnecessary for choice of a President, and do not bear on the XII Amendment's criteria of eligibility.

106 posted on 05/03/2020 8:46:22 AM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The XX Amendment says NOTHING about eligibility to the office. It says he can’t be ELECTED to the office of President. It says it twice. It does not mention the Vice Presidency - at all.

Do you mean the 22nd amendment?

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

Why are you taking each amendment in isolation and acting as if nothing else in the Constitution exists?

The 22nd amendment says the President cannot be elected more than twice. The 12th amendment says the eligibility for President also applies to the Vice-President. Therefore, nobody elected twice as President can be Vice-President.

If we're going to play your game, then we should ignore Article 2 because the 22nd amendment only says the President can't be elected more than twice. Therefore, anyone of any age, residency, and citizenship can run for President because the 22nd amendment says nothing about that, only the number of times elected.

-PJ

107 posted on 05/03/2020 9:24:37 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace
“no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.”

It would be a question for the Supreme Court.

What exactly does “Elected” mean?

There's the loophole. It does not say not allowed to SERVE in the office.

108 posted on 05/03/2020 9:44:36 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Democrats have ZERO respect for the sanctity of the vote . . . AND ESPECIALLY FOR THE CONSTITUTION!!!

There, I fixed it!!!


109 posted on 05/03/2020 10:10:23 AM PDT by Conservinator (It's okay to be close-minded IF you are right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Someone who is 25 is INELIGIBLE to the office of President, and therefore is also INELIGIBLE to the office of Vice President.

So is someone who has served two terms.

But the XXII Amendment does not make anyone ineligible to anything.

But the 12th Amendment does: "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be elected president, he cannot constitutionally be eligible to be elected vice-president.

110 posted on 05/03/2020 10:30:18 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be elected president

That is correct.

Are there ways to become President without being elected?

111 posted on 05/03/2020 10:41:56 AM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Are there ways to become President without being elected?

Google Gerald Ford.

112 posted on 05/03/2020 12:09:54 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator

Nice fix - thanks.


113 posted on 05/03/2020 3:10:43 PM PDT by GOPJ (Was misery & death worth the four bucks saved on the crappy waffle-iron 'made in China?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

Eternal vigilance is the price of FReedom!

[Apologies to Thomas Jefferson]


114 posted on 05/03/2020 6:32:33 PM PDT by Taxman ((We will never be a truly FRee people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Impy; MrEdd; campaignPete R-CT; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; LS

Textually, the 22nd Amendment does not prohibit a two-term president from being elected VP and later becoming president because of death, resignation or removal. But Obama is done with politics, and he won’t be running for VP.


115 posted on 05/03/2020 10:28:45 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

It’s fairly clear that the Electors meeting in the Electoral College to cast ballots are “Electing” the President & VP.

It’s not so clear whether the House, when “choosing ... by ballot”, is “Electing” the President.


116 posted on 05/04/2020 1:40:31 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

That is the 22nd amendment not the 12th but still a valid point. Thank you


117 posted on 05/04/2020 7:36:25 PM PDT by freedomlver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: freedomlver
That is the 22nd amendment not the 12th but still a valid point. Thank you

Look it up for yourself and get back to me.

Read the very last sentence.

-PJ

118 posted on 05/04/2020 7:40:43 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson