[Political Junkie Too]

As I posted in another thread:

---

If we leave out the rape and take Reade's initial reduced accusations from 2019 of being fired for refusing to be "eye candy" serving drinks for a Senator and then being retaliated against, how does that stack up against the Democrats disqualifying Mitt Romney for having "binders of women" in 2012, meaning background checks on qualified women to work in his administration?

Were the actions she DID recount really acceptable social norms in 1993, Bill Clinton's first year in office, or is it really changing the goalposts when the Democrats are on the receiving end of the scandal?

Was Romney having research on highly qualified women in 2012 WORSE than Biden wanting women staffers to be cocktail waitresses in 1993?

---

-PJ

[MrEdd]

The things Romney actually did as Governor of Massachusetts were far worse than the fake issues that the Uniparty threw at him to make him a more sympathetic candidate.

So everything Romney is irrelevant, stick to closer parallels like Brett Kavanaugh

[cquiggy]

The dems also tried to peddle the lie about Kavanaugh organizing a gang bang or rape of Christie Balsey Ford.