What is the 'substantial number' needed to prove voting fraud?
Had that been at issue, the question would have been correctly asked “Have substantial numbers of legal voters been disenfranchised by this law, and what evidence can the plaintiff provide?”
The courts must rightly assume that the legislature has the absolute right to pass legislation AS THEY SEE FIT, unless and until the legislation has been proven to violate a constitutional protection. Not the other way around.
This is a clear usurpation of legislative authority by the court... All judged involved in this action should be physically removed and hanged from lampposts.
How is this for irony, the political party fighting for no-id voting (’D’emocrat) is the same party that suppressed voting in post-reconstruction South and in the urban cities like Tammany Hall (NYC), Chicago, Kansas City etc. Without their CRIMES, this would be a no-brainer like 98% of the rest of the world!
The reporting omitted the most salient facts about the case— the identities of the judges.
The three judge panel that heard the case consisted of: Monroe McKay, a Carter appointee who died after oral arguments but before the opinion was released, so he technically did not vote; Mary Beck Briscoe, a Clinton appointee; and Jerome Holmes, an African American who was a Bush 43 appointee.
You had three liberals sitting on the panel. The resulting opinion was not a surprise.
Also, while Kansas is a part of the 10th Circuit along with Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming and Utah, the 10th Circuit is headquartered in the federal courthouse in Denver.
It wasn't "The Tenth Circuit" ruling on this - it was a TWO-judge panel, not even the usual three-judge panel, because one of the fossils from the Tenth kicked off before the "decision".
The two remaining globalists agreed, so this is where we got this piece of cr@p ruling.The three judges were Mary Briscoe, a Clinton appointee; Jerome Holmes, a Bush Jr. appointee; and Monroe McKay, a Carter appointee. Judge McKay died on March 28, 2020, at the age of 91, so the vote was 2-0. Tenth Circuit rules permit a panel of two surviving judges to release an opinion when the two judges agree with each other.
The original District of Kansas "judge" was a Smirking Chimp [Dubya] globalist named Julie A. Robinson.
I should think that proof of ONE illegal registering to vote should be substantiation of needing some kind of law against it. Oh, & I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that their governor is a Democrat.
Yeah - like saying, “...has failed to show that Mr. Manson intends to kill again...”
Flawed reasoning. Where did they pull this substantial number standard from? We have tens of millions of illegals in this country, and they should not vote.
This must be taken to the Supreme Court where it will be overturned.