Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First at-home coronavirus test approved by FDA
KVAL (CBS, Eugene Oregon) ^ | April 22nd 2020 | Kaylin Jorge

Posted on 04/22/2020 9:24:48 AM PDT by BeauBo

The Food and Drug Administration has approved the first at-home test for the coronavirus.

It's made by LabCorp, that said due to limited quantities, it will first be made available to healthcare workers and first responders...

The FDA approval is not a "general authorization for at-home collection of patient samples" and only applies to the LabCorp testing kit.

Right now, the kits are available in Maryland, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island.

(Excerpt) Read more at kval.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chinavirushometest; chinavirustest; corona; covid; covid19; fda; homechinavirustest; hometest; test
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 04/22/2020 9:24:48 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Given the fact that some tests have been shown to contain the virus and have infected people, I’ll pass.


2 posted on 04/22/2020 9:26:45 AM PDT by rickomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

The modern medical industry is quite amazing and this crisis is really highlighted how once we put a businessman in charge he went to the real people who make it run , which are the large laboratories

The fact that we could go from not knowing what this thing even was two months ago to having something like this is absolutely amazing

The only insidious and dangerous part about the medical industry is their zeal for vaccines


3 posted on 04/22/2020 9:27:02 AM PDT by Truthoverpower (The guv mint you get is the Trump winning express !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
This headline and first sentence are highly misleading. This is NOT a "test" in any sense. It is merely a sample collection kit to be used at home rather than having to go to a medical facility.
4 posted on 04/22/2020 9:30:38 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

Where are these made ?

Nobody wants to talk about that do they.


5 posted on 04/22/2020 9:31:26 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Wow...filling those vials at home is going to take more than a finger prick with a tiny lancet. “DIY Phlebotomy” — I think I’ll pass.


6 posted on 04/22/2020 9:32:32 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England
Where are these made ?

According to a recent Trump press conference the Oak Ridge National Laboratory has been pressed into service due to their apparently large injection molding capacity.

From nukes to plastic snot vials with the stroke of a pen.


7 posted on 04/22/2020 9:35:29 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Don’t expect to get one of these tests. Even if there were to be made generally available, and hundreds of millions magically produced, every neurotic brain-addled hypochondriac is going to buy up pallets of them to test themselves every 30 seconds.

Sounds like a cash cow for the manufacturer, though.


8 posted on 04/22/2020 9:36:38 AM PDT by Mr. Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
That's a misleading photo. The manufacturer's web site says:
COVID-19 Test (At-Home Kit)
Sample Type: Nasal Swab

GET STARTED - $119

Now you can access COVID-19 testing from home.
We'll send you an at-home kit to collect your nasal swab sample and ship it back to our lab. Our lab will test your sample for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease (also called COVID-19), a respiratory illness.

This test is designed to determine active infection with the virus that causes COVID-19; it is NOT designed to determine the presence of antibodies or assess immununity. (sic)

So you can test your "immununity" by shoving a Q-Tip up your nose and sending it back to them for testing.

Would you trust a medical device company that cannot even spell "immunity" on its own web site???

Is it REALLY that hard to proof-read your product page on your own web site?

9 posted on 04/22/2020 9:38:46 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

There are 6700 confirmed cases in the Bay Area.

Using Stanford Scientific measure to estimate actual number of 50-80 times infected and using the lower denominator of 50

We find 6700 x 50= 335,000

There are 218 CCP-19 deaths

Result?

218 ÷ 335,000=0.06507463%

WTX are we doing?


10 posted on 04/22/2020 9:41:04 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Nasal swab


11 posted on 04/22/2020 9:42:18 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Lots of people are saying it’s wrong to believe the Stanford 50X-80X findings, that the methodology and statistics were very faulty.


12 posted on 04/22/2020 9:44:25 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Yeah?

Well they are fookin wrong.

CDC regularly uses guesstimates in their annual tally of flu infections and flu related deaths.

They use the confirmed cases and a formula to arrive at estimates.

BTW, many are saying Fauxci is wrong and yet, here we are...


13 posted on 04/22/2020 9:46:51 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo
I don't know what the big deal about TESTING is.
One either HAS the virus and is sick as a dog OR one doesn't have the virus and is careful.

Who needs a test to know if he's sick?

And we know that not all tests or testing is 100% correct all the time.

14 posted on 04/22/2020 9:48:11 AM PDT by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo

Not terribly exciting. This is a self-collection kit. You swab your own nose and then mail it in and wait for this results. Not really seeing this as a major game changer. It ain’t an instant-result home pregnancy test sorta thing.


15 posted on 04/22/2020 9:48:11 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

One more thing

Gavin Gruesome said that 25.5 million Californians could be infected.

Someone he trusts gave him that number and I think it is wholly improbable

But, if he wants to stick with 2/3rds then he can live with my lower estimates.

That

His boo chit number is why he is slow walking opening California and he is both immoral and amoral


16 posted on 04/22/2020 9:49:54 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

https://www.wvlt.tv/content/news/President-Trump—569789191.html

OAK RIDGE, Tenn. (WVLT) - During President Trump’s White House briefing Sunday evening, he mentioned how different states and organizations are stepping up to help the country during the COVID-19 pandemic.

ORNL researcher works with radioactive material/ (WVLT)
One group on the list was the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in East Tennessee.

“We are working with the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to use its injection molding capacity to potentially produce over ten million collection tubes per week, that’s tremendous numbers,” said President Trump while addressing the country.

ORNL took to Twitter Sunday afternoon saying they are joining other national labs in the fight against COVID-19.

“ORNL researchers are applying expertise in computational science, advanced manufacturing, data science and neutron science to combat #COVID19”, the tweet read.


17 posted on 04/22/2020 10:05:49 AM PDT by HangnJudge (China Lied, People died, Never Forget, this Decade's 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

It would help if the aymptomatics knew they were infected so they could quarantine and not be a major source of spread. But, as you say, the accuracy needs to be there. Also, I don’t understand the benefit of this test verses one you can have professionally done for free/less with a quucker turn around time.


18 posted on 04/22/2020 10:17:18 AM PDT by Moonlighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rickomatic

Wow. Do you have a link to reputable article on this?


19 posted on 04/22/2020 10:19:43 AM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
It ain’t an instant-result home pregnancy test sorta thing

That's what is needed and would be a game changer.

20 posted on 04/22/2020 10:19:45 AM PDT by Moonlighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson