Posted on 04/19/2020 3:16:51 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Plans for a lockdown in Malawi have been scuppered at the last minute, after a court injuction ordered it be delayed by at least seven days, lawyers say.
It was due to begin on Saturday.
The news will come as a relief to traders who have fiercely opposed a lockdown because of the serious threat they say it poses to their livelihoods.
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...
That is not the case for poor countries.
Due to corruption, inept leadership, misapplication of funds etc etc etc (lack of resources in poor countries ranks well below things like corruption and bad leadership), poor countries simply cannot experiment.
A good example of what happens when things go wrong in a poor country is Ecuador, where they are leaving dead bodies in the streets. The link below shows how things have shat themselves in Ecuador:
https://youtu.be/XHsfjnRB-uA
Bottomline - wealthy nations like the US, Italy, UK etc can see if there are more efficient ways to solve the COVID19 situation without locking themselves up in fear. But countries like Malawi and other poor countries in Africa, Latin America and Southern Asia would probably find it prudent to lock up, feed the poor and see how the wealthier nations of the world resolve COVID19 first.
Rich countries have bad demographics for this virus warehouse their elderly, and coddle immune systems. They also are able to print money and give a few months wages to many people quickly and without immediately causing hyper inflation.
Ecuador used to be a more prosperous country.
It also wouldn’t surprise me if Ecuador was already leaving a few bodies on the street.
On a thread about the four inner-city Atlanta hospitals being over capacity with people on beds in the hall, someone pointed out that this was not an infrequent occurrence before anyone had heard of COVID 9.
FAR more people have died from the flu this year, so why the paranoid concern over this virus??
Now, seeing the deaths that happened in Italy, how the British NHS is close to being overwhelmed, and how NYC until a week ago was looking really bad, I get worried. Sure - Northern Italy may have a preponderance of old vulnerable people, the NHS may not be the best example to use, and Cuomo appeared to be quite unprepared. So, people may have reasons why that didnt work there.
But my point is that all those examples are from wealthy geographies. If they dont go on lockdown and lets assume COVID19 is not just a flu, they have the ability to throw massive resources at the problem to fix it.
Countries like Malawi - and most countries in Africa and Latin America - are simply not capable of that. Already Ecuador is undergoing a very real crisis, and maybe when the flu hits Ecuador they also leave bodies in the streets or maybe there might be something about COVID19.
Either way, my point is this - poor countries (at this point) should practice strict social distancing and assume the worst. When the US reopens starting May 1 we will all (very quickly) see if things get better or things get worse. If they get better, the poor countries can reopen too. If they get worse, then the poor countries learn a lesson without having to pay the cost.
But poor countries simply cannot afford to assume COVID19 is nothing ...and be wrong.
That's totally false. Did you read that on the Internet?
The African Network for Influenza Surveillance and Epidemiology (ANISE)
But going back to my original point - poor countries should wait through the month of May and observe how wealthy countries who reopen cope. All will be evident very quickly whether its something or nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.