Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shanover
Everyone posting on this thread should take some time to understand two basic economic measures: money SUPPLY and the VELOCITY of money. If there is a money supply in the system of $2 trillion and the Fed injects another $1 trillion while nothing else has changed, you get immediate inflation of 50%. Every dollar has lost about a third of its value.

But if the money supply is $2 trillion and half the economy shuts down over an unforeseen meltdown, the Fed can inject another $1 trillion without any inflationary consequence because it is increasing the money supply by $1 trillion to make up for the $1 trillion in lost economic activity.

INFLATION isn’t really the concern here. The Fed is trying to stave off a potential period of DEFLATION.

14 posted on 03/29/2020 12:44:18 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Is there an issue with the lessening impact of increased money, with an increased debt? That is, injecting $1T with a debt of $1T has big consequences.... does it also follow that injecting $1T with a debt of $23T has less impact?


21 posted on 03/29/2020 1:11:26 PM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Thank you. This is a subject I struggle with. Any insight is welcome.


24 posted on 03/29/2020 1:21:48 PM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson