[MortMan]

It is true, though, that a different assessment of who was being wronged would likely have resulted in an order to make Trump not enforce the policy while the case continues.

Can you elucidate on this?

[JOHN ADAMS]

What I meant was that if the Court thought that the asylum applicants had a strong case then it might have been more inclined to allow the Trump administration policy to be stayed — because then the policy would be [if the Court thought that way] unjustly keeping people out of the US, and in a place where they allegedly faced some sort of threat; that’s the basis for an asylum claim.

I hope that’s clear. And even if it’s clear, it might be wrong. But that’s what I was thinking.