To: dontreadthis
Judge Reggie Walton said Barr could not be trusted and cited “inconsistencies” between his statements about the report when it was secret and its actual contents that turned out to be more damaging to President Donald Trump. Walton said Barr’s “lack of candor” called “into question Attorney General Barr’s credibility and, in turn, the department’s” assurances to the court. Not a single word of that is true...yet stated as a fact by a judge in court.
To: Republican Wildcat
>> and cited “inconsistencies” between his statements about the report when it was secret and its actual contents that turned out to be more damaging to President Donald Trump.
Like ahole Schiff claiming he had proof of Russian collusion? Like Schiff’s phony transcript of the Ukraine call?
10 posted on
03/05/2020 5:19:07 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Everyone knows Hillary was corrupt, lied, destroyed documents, and influenced witnesses. Rat crime.)
To: Republican Wildcat
cognitive dissonance
Reality eludes them
11 posted on
03/05/2020 5:19:26 PM PST by
griswold3
(Democratic Socialism is Slavery by Mob Rule)
To: Republican Wildcat
Statements like that do not are not supposed to be issued by a sitting judge. It shows strong prejudice.
27 posted on
03/05/2020 6:05:49 PM PST by
lastchance
(Credo.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson