“...found that the Texas law had no medical benefits and placed an unconstitutional burden on women seeking abortion. “
Does the U.S. givernment have a medical benefits requirement in the law....?
>>
“...found that the Texas law had no medical benefits and placed an unconstitutional burden on women seeking abortion. “
>>
>
Does the U.S. givernment have a medical benefits requirement in the law....?
>
No word on the ‘medical benefit’, let alone ‘burden’ (constitutional or not), denied the ABORTED (Life being a struggle)...
If Roberts rules using this rationale, pro-life groups should begin an onslaught of court challenges to standard state-mandated medical requirements which don’t describe an explicit medical benefit - citing this ruling as “binding.”
You noticed too; eh?