[lepton]

Lamberth is a serious pain in the craw for the Clintons.

[jazusamo]

Off the Wall Ping!

Contact to be added.

[red-dawg]

"Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions LIED about this and should not have to do so again

[mumblypeg]

Pointless, IMO, to ask the same questions. She’ll give the same answers.

We need to RECOVER, & SEE the contents of, the 1000s of emails she DELETED.
I understand this can be done. Why haven’t we done it?

I’m convinced espionage was afoot, & those emails are evidence.

[Howie66]

I pray for the health and safety for Judge Lamberth and his family.

[jazusamo]

MAGA!

Let’s Wrap This FReepathon Up, Folks…Donate Today!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a new monthly donor!

[Jonty30]

She’s like food poisoning. She just keeps coming up. Eventually her own hit squad will help her commit suicide.

[cgbg]

Her state of mind was that she was running an international extortion ring (aka the Clinton Foundation) and didn’t think it would be a really great idea to run all through the emails through a .gov server....

This is not difficult to figure out...

[upchuck]

Last sentence of the article:

Lamberth said he is not ready to do so, saying that "there is still more to learn."

The judge is right. IMHO, there are tons of info yet to be discovered, much of it likely incriminating. I feel they have just scratched the surface.

Thank goodness for patriots like Judge Lamberth.

[teeman8r]

she will not recall a lot of things... but will notice how depressed that federal judge will seem to be before her deposition.

[tennmountainman]

Judicial Watch doing the Job AG Barr refuses to do.

[Night Hides Not]

"As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business," Lamberth said.

Translation: Hillary was lying her arse off.

[MayflowerMadam]

I can’t remember
My brain’s in a blender
It’s Jell-o
Jell-o

[bkopto]

Hillary Clinton sit for a sworn deposition to answer questions

How useless is this?

"I don't recall."

"I don't remember."

"I don't recall."

"I don't remember."

"I don't recall."

"I don't remember."

"I don't recall."

"I don't remember."

"I don't recall."

"I don't remember."

"I don't recall."

"I don't remember."

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

I’m dreaming, right? A judge actually ruled against the Queen Demon from Hell Hillary F. Clinton?

[slowhandluke]

"As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business," Lamberth said.

Who cares what her state of mind was? The pertinent law does not include either intent or state of mind as excuses. She's guilty, and needs to go to jail.

[PerConPat]

ping

[PerConPat]

18 U.S.C. § 793(f) excerpt--

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—-Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

According to a 2016 DOJ Mid Year OIG Review Team report in advance of the 2016 election, "they [Comey? Strzok?] concluded that Section 793(f)(1) likely required a state of mind that was 'so gross as to almost suggest deliberate intention,' criminally reckless, or 'something that falls just short of being willful,' as well as evidence that the individuals who sent emails containing classified information 'knowingly' included or transferred such information onto unclassified systems."

"The Mid Year team concluded that such proof was lacking. We found that this interpretation of Section 793(f)(1) was consistent with the Department’s historical approach in prior cases under different leadership, including in the 2008 decision not to prosecute former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales for mishandling classified documents."

The above was taken from the linked gov document. I apologize for the length of this post, but this sums up, IMO, the preferential treatment given to Clinton.

Gonzalez was not prosecuted because investigators found that "It is clear from the report that there is no evidence that the acknowledged shortcomings in [Gonzales'] handling of this material resulted in any unauthorized disclosure of classified information," ... I don't believe the same can be said for Clinton. Taking "handwritten notes" home and misplacing them in the work place is much different than placing classified info onto unsecured internet servers. I hope, but doubt, that things will go differently this time for Hillary

[slouper]

This Judge will be Scalia’d very soon.