Good article.
I once created stumped man made climate change religiouso with a couple of questions. I first had to make him swear to honestly answer the questions directly.
1.) Given the known geological history of our planet, do you agree that the global environment, including average surface temperature is, and has been, always changing and that it is not static?
2.) Is it better for humans if the average global surface temperature is very gradually increasing or decreasing over hundreds or thousands of years?
After answering and pausing, he started to explain the rate of heating is too fast and that’s humans’ fault. Oh, what is the correct rate of temperature change per year? That ended it.
There is no science to it because 1.) There is no control that all can agree constitutes a “normal” 2.) There is no reproducible experiment that provides consistent empirical evidence to support CO2 “super conductor” status as a greenhouse gas.
I’m still waiting for an answer to my question, “how did the Medieval Warm Period occur, considering SUV’s had not been invented?”
Toss these against the wall:
1. Define the correct temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the correct humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the correct mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the correct amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the correct makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the correct amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
Crickets..............