More Democrat mourning. Cant wait.
First paragraph leaves out important information.
There is no "anti-immigrant sentiment" It is ant-illegal invader sentiment.
If you tell someone to rob a bank and then that person does can you be held complicit?
What’s so SCARY about the Law currently in place?
Complicity is the act of helping or encouraging another individual to commit a crime. It is also commonly referred to as aiding and abetting. One who is complicit is said to be an accomplice.
But, even though an accomplice does not actually commit the crime, his
or her actions helped someone in the commission of the crime.
The concept of accomplice liability means an accomplice faces the
same degree of guilt and punishment as the individual who committed the
crime.
My thought exactly
and perhaps accessory both before and after the fact.
Well, heres a tougher immigration policy.
Lest we forget ...
This should be part of a Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement bill, missing since 1986 ONE TIME amnesty. The List of Comprehensive Immigration Enforcement, missing since 1986 goes like this -
1) southern barrier;
2) require eVerify to hire;
3) end all chain migration;
4) birthright per Minor v. Happersett (plural parents);
5) end work visas;
6) 10-year moratorium on all new applications for citizenship (40 years to allow workplace automation effects on downsizing population);
7) Set up an illegal aliens victim restitution fund.
Enactment of these provisions will motivate illegal aliens to SELF-deport, and remove colonizadors from our welfare rolls.
I am of the opinion that the law needs to be better written. It should allow for advice in legal immigration and not allow advice for illegal immigration.
Use the power of applying the principle to a cause you love or promote.
The Left could create a law such as this corrolary:
“Any person who ... encourages or induces an person to access, possess, or make any firearm, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such access, possession or making will be in violation of law ... shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).”
Wonder what she would say if folks started exhorting folks to invade her home and then coming home to find them watching her TV and eating her potato chips...
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Sanctuary cities and driver’s licenses for illegals are both violations of the statutes.
We need a clear win for the law in this case, and then start prosecuting elected officials for their treasonous acts.
The would only be upholding the powers on Congress.
This is the first time I have even heard of the section 8 law being used against these traitors. It is way past time to put it to good use.
I wish this could happen here in Canada. Scumbag lowlifes these immigration lawyers.
“The chilling effect it would have on non-citizens and their allies would be profound and especially insidious in this political moment of increasing, and increasingly nefarious, anti-immigrant sentiment.”
The more chilling the better.
Sounds like it's already criminal. How interesting.