thing either...
Does it seem many of the Democrats that are NOT Communists
or perverts are beginning to walk away?
The Corruptocrats are being forced to defend multiple fronts as their party implodes!
Does it seem many of the Democrats that are NOT Communists
or perverts are beginning to walk away?
The Corruptocrats are being forced to defend multiple fronts as their party implodes!
I consider that an insult to Alfred E. Newman.
Yes, and if history is any guide going back to 1952, I don’t see a nominee of either Dem or GOP party who didn’t come in at least 1st or 2nd in either Iowa or New Hampshire. e.g. Reagan came in 2nd to Bush in 1980 in Iowa but won New Hampshire and there were 6 candidates so full fields are not that unusual.
In Iowa, 1992 with an Iowa Dem Senator running, and sex scandals breaking Bill Clinton finished 3rd or 4th if you count uncommitted, but finished 2nd in New Hampshire.
McCain came in a close 4th in Iowa in 2008 and won New Hampshire , every other nominee of either party has come in either either 1st or 2nd in one of the two.
So if this holds the nominees is going to be either Bernie or Mayor Pete B
Biden or others might defy history because the country has higher % “people of color” in other states but its looking like Sanders to me. as there is also a trend of who came in 2nd last time in primaries wins next time. Bloomberg is the wild card as advertising does pay but it would be hard for lefties to support a billionaire
So long as the other candidates stay in it Bernie isn’t really ahead of anything. If he gets to the convention with merely a plurality without it being a majority of delegates then the DNC will choose its own Nominee. Alfred E But]*+/g and Bernie staying close together in the delegate count with Pocahontas slogging along at a couple of % and Whozizs and Whodatt each getting another couple of % gives the choice to the DNC and Bernie gets flushed unless, of course, DNC calculates he can actually win the election.