That the anational bureaucracy patronizes the distinct peoples with encouraging PC compliant forms of cultural expression, is not a persuasive argument.
I gave you links to my more extensive arguments. Each has a menu of yet more extensive argument.
1. Dictating nation’s immigration policy - you do realize that Member States retain the right to determine volumes of admission for people coming from third countries to seek work and that EU law makes no provision for the harmonisation of national laws and regulations.
Germany wanted to force other states to take non-eu nationals and they failed - it was vetoed.
What example of dictating do you have?
2. relations between the sexes - again, what exactly are you talking about? There is no policy forcing this — can you name what policy you are referring to?
And you didn’t give me “links to my extensive arguments” — what you did give were links to some Sanders-like ranting blog.
No facts, no links to any policies - and the blog posts you link are not only without any facts besides rants, they are rants from 2001