What is the line where “prosecution” becomes “persecution”?
The President was given NO due process when the question of his “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” were being parlayed by Schiff, Nadler, Pelosi and Comany into a highly specious declaration of “articles of impeachment”.
This was what Professor Dershowitz was concerned with, when he appeared to be defending the President’s actions (which he was), in face of the serious allegations made against him, which were not allowed to be challenged.
So it was a very BAD bill of particulars that was put before the Senate, and the Senate was not to supposed to be advised of this deficiency?
The case put forth by the prosecution may seem to be airtight, until it is held up to cross-examination.
And man, did it get the wind taken out when it got punctured.
The House had 18 witnesses, all selected by the Democrat ‘prosecution’ with little in the way of cross examination. One would assume that would be the high point of their case, and yet it didn’t come close to a crime, much less an impeachable one. Bolton’s testimonial would not seem to call into question whether Biden’s actions could reasonably be seen as corrupt.