To: a fool in paradise
I don't know what the statute of limitations is in NY and it's probably different for civil and criminal. It's not clear from this what kind of case she wants to bring.
I would think the statute has passed, but in the era of Weinstein and Cosby states have been lengthening them and in some cases eliminating them. This seems to be a textbook case for statutes of limitation. How do you litigate a case where the witnesses and evidence are 30 years old if they are even still around?
To: colorado tanker
Perhaps she’s trying to establish enough of a defense against a libel lawsuit for her fraudulent book.
37 posted on
01/30/2020 4:44:08 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(We need a tax to stamp out Communism- If you espouse Marxism weÂ’ll redistribute all of your money.)
To: colorado tanker
There was no chain of custody on the evidence.
I don’t see how it can be admissible.
38 posted on
01/30/2020 4:44:52 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(We need a tax to stamp out Communism- If you espouse Marxism weÂ’ll redistribute all of your money.)
To: colorado tanker
In New York, I believe the statute of limitations for rape is now 20 years. She’s too late.
44 posted on
01/30/2020 5:05:26 PM PST by
A_perfect_lady
(The greatest wealth is to live content with little. -Plato)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson