It’s not yet at all clear that Bolton’s book says what the NYT says it says. Plus we appear to have another NSC leaker related to a Dem witness.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3811309/posts
Again, not so fast. This is phrased carefully to look like more than it is.
(See picture of text)
Preferred being the key word here. In any case, the aid was sent on and there was no deal. No investigation. Trump sought materials they already had not a new investigation.
Now the rest of the story and theres less there than meets the eye.
True.
But Bolten could speak up and address what was said in the NYT. It doesn't look like he's going to do that.