Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: McGruff

It’s not yet at all clear that Bolton’s book says what the NYT says it says. Plus we appear to have another NSC leaker related to a Dem witness.


16 posted on 01/27/2020 3:52:28 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3811309/posts

Again, not so fast. This is phrased carefully to look like more than it is.

(See picture of text)

“Preferred” being the key word here. In any case, the aid was sent on and there was no deal. No investigation. Trump sought materials they already had – not a new investigation.
Now the rest of the story and there’s less there than meets the eye.


26 posted on 01/27/2020 4:04:45 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: lepton
It’s not yet at all clear that Bolton’s book says what the NYT says it says. \

True.

But Bolten could speak up and address what was said in the NYT. It doesn't look like he's going to do that.

40 posted on 01/27/2020 4:32:48 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson