To: Kaslin
I think there is a legitimate question as to why the first several elections in the nomination process are never rotated around. You would think the parties would also require the first few states to hold elections in the nomination process actually regularly vote for their party in recent general elections.
Freegards
6 posted on
01/27/2020 12:02:19 PM PST by
Ransomed
To: Ransomed
I think states pretty much have all the authority when it comes to scheduling their elections. New Hampshire could probably schedule its 2024 primary in January 2023 if it wants to.
22 posted on
01/27/2020 1:13:19 PM PST by
Alberta's Child
("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
To: Ransomed
I think there is a legitimate question as to why the first several elections in the nomination process are never rotated around. You would think the parties would also require the first few states to hold elections in the nomination process actually regularly vote for their party in recent general elections.I agree with you on this.
28 posted on
01/27/2020 1:58:23 PM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Ransomed
The parties could easily solve the problem just by making a formula to award extra delegates to states which wait until later. It ain't rocket science.
There is already a delegate allocation formula to favor states which support the party's nominee consistently.
47 posted on
01/28/2020 10:05:47 AM PST by
Vigilanteman
(The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson