Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Why not have a national primary election day? That way, certain states won’t have this perceived unfair advantage in the nomination process.

I understand and appreciate people saying that other states or regions should be able to have the first primaries/caucuses, but I question why we can’t just have a national primary election day,and wouldn’t that be the fairest way of all of nominating candidates?

Of course, parties don’t have to have primaries at all. They can choose nominees in a smoke filled convention hall with delegates chosen by the powers that be.

Even under the current set up, either party could decline to hold caucuses/primaries in Iowa and New Hampshire. This situation just evolved for them to go first. There’s no reason they need to always go first, or to have their caucuses/primaries at all.


19 posted on 01/27/2020 12:57:48 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

Nationwide primary would mean only candidates with a billion dollar budget going in would be able to compete.


21 posted on 01/27/2020 1:11:39 PM PST by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson