Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats face risks and limits in Trump’s impeachment trial
The Associated Press ^ | January 23, 2020 | By LISA MASCARO, ERIC TUCKER and ZEKE MILLER

Posted on 01/23/2020 6:33:47 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

The challenge is becoming increasingly clear for House Democrats prosecuting President Donald Trump’s impeachment case as the Senate convenes for a second day of arguments in the landmark trial.

No matter how overwhelming the evidence confronting Trump, it becomes less compelling when presented again and again, day after day, as Democrats try to convince not just fidgety senators but an American public deeply divided over the Republican president in an election year.

The team led by Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of House Intelligence Committee, constructed a gripping account of Trump’s political pressure on Ukraine and attempt to cover up the “corrupt scheme” central to the charges. But the limits are apparent. Prosecutors must rely on the same loops of videotaped testimony — ambassadors, national security officials and even the president himself — after Trump’s GOP Senate allies blocked new witnesses.

Democrats were once reluctant to take on impeachment during an election year but are marching toward a decision by the Senate that the American public also will judge.

Some Republicans expressed disdain for it all. Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa spoke sarcastically about how excited she was to hear the “overwhelming evidence” the House Democrats promised against Trump.

“And once we’ve heard that overwhelming evidence,” she said, raising her voice mockingly, “I don’t know that we’ll need to see additional witnesses, but let’s hear about that overwhelming evidence.”

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bias; failedcoup; impeachment; journalism; schiff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 01/23/2020 6:33:47 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
less compelling when presented again and again

When you have no evidence, and you loop it over and over, clearly it hurts your case.

2 posted on 01/23/2020 6:35:34 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The team led by Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of House Intelligence Committee, constructed a gripping account of Trump’s political pressure on Ukraine and attempt to cover up the “corrupt scheme” central to the charges.

lol

3 posted on 01/23/2020 6:36:17 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

There is no overwhelming evidence and this sham only reinforces that. This is going to be trouble for the Democrats and at the end people will be calling for their heads.


4 posted on 01/23/2020 6:36:48 AM PST by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
” No matter how overwhelming the evidence confronting Trump, ...”

Overwhelming? What’s ‘overwhelming’ is the sheer number of times Schiff & Nads have lied about ‘uncontested evidence’ of POTUS’ wrongdoing.
5 posted on 01/23/2020 6:37:37 AM PST by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
No matter how overwhelming the evidence confronting Trump

Where is this evidence?? the Only Evidence is the Actual Transcript of the call, everything else is assumptions and presumptions based on gossip and inuendo.

NOTHING Presented to the Senate so far would EVER see the Light of Day in ANY Court Room in America. It is ALL Hearsay and Gossip.
6 posted on 01/23/2020 6:38:14 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
One House Manager was a black woman, chosen for "diversity." She could not read Nanzi's prepared script out loud.
A House Manager that cant read shows a complete and utter contempt of the Senate............and of taxpayers.

They're playing Hillary's game: playing to their donor base, giving them a thrill to get donations.
They fail to realize the rest of us are paying attention.

Meanwhile Trump is waging war against Deep State.
<><>Trump's appointment of scores of federal judges and two world-class USSC justices,
<><> his super-ability to organize huge rallies,
<><> his ability to unite even he most recalcitrant Republicans.
<><> exposing ways the Deep State monetized public policy.

Democraps have amassed huge fortunes on the backs of working class taxpayers.

And for this, the Democrats must stop Trump. Democraps are in abject fear.

7 posted on 01/23/2020 6:42:32 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
It is ALL Hearsay and Gossip.

Indeed, and the fact that the senators didn't dismiss after day one dirties the fine legacy of the Senate and contributes to future farcical impeachments.

8 posted on 01/23/2020 6:43:00 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What could be less compelling then being told again and again that Trump is guilty because “We know what he was thinking”?


9 posted on 01/23/2020 6:44:38 AM PST by Agatsu77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Quite honestly I do not know how the senators can sit hours on end forced to listen to the drivel coming from the podium. It reminds me of going to DMV traffic school and being lectured for the day on driving safety to get a traffic ticket dismissed. I guess that’s why they invented No Doz.


10 posted on 01/23/2020 6:47:51 AM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

By LISA MASCARO, ERIC TUCKER and ZEKE MILLER......In the old days it just took one journalist to lie up a crapola article.

Ever noticed how the majority of lying screeds spewed by the MSM have 2, 3 even 4 authors nowadays?


11 posted on 01/23/2020 6:48:01 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Evidence? For what? It’s day three Schiffy, what is the crime?


12 posted on 01/23/2020 6:51:49 AM PST by Kozy (new age haruspex; "Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The more compelling the evidence, the more it speaks for itself. The less compelling the evidence, the more it needs people to speak for it. The more they speak, the less convinced people will be. I say speak on, Schiffty!


13 posted on 01/23/2020 6:53:34 AM PST by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The AP states, without providing any proof, “No matter how overwhelming the evidence confronting Trump...’.

Plus, NO ONE is watching. It’s a bad rerun of a boring Schiff show.


14 posted on 01/23/2020 6:58:03 AM PST by jdsteel (Americans are Dreamers too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I think even the rabid anti-Trump partisans at the AP and other media outlets are genuinely shocked at how much stronger and more assertive President Trump has gotten since this impeachment charade began last year.


15 posted on 01/23/2020 6:59:59 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
“Gripping” — LOLOL. What childish authors.

Maybe they can have Schiff give some of that “gripping” to Pelosi.


16 posted on 01/23/2020 7:00:34 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Stupid, AP. There is no “overwhelming evidence”. In fact, there is no crime. What a ridiculous charade this impeachment is. Absolutely disgusting and sickening.


17 posted on 01/23/2020 7:02:14 AM PST by KansasGirl (Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
“…once we’ve heard that overwhelming evidence, I don’t know that we’ll need to see additional witnesses, but let’s hear about that overwhelming evidence.” — Senator Joni Ernst

YEAH...mock the bastards!

18 posted on 01/23/2020 7:03:51 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

But they are all 21 years old. When you have three of them write an article, you have a combined 63 years of experience like you got in the old days with one grizzled, seen-it-all reporter.


19 posted on 01/23/2020 7:07:45 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

AP doing ground prep for the coming EPIC FAIL!


20 posted on 01/23/2020 7:08:44 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson