Nope. Your take is without merits regarding context at all. Polish-Russian relations had nothing to do with it in 1920.
These territories weren’t part of Russia anymore and USSR didn’t exist yet.
It was a Polish annexation of Ukraine - a separate nation at the time.
I guess you disagree with Russian annexation of Crimea but then based on your very same logic Russia has right to annex not only Crimea which is historically more Russian but all the Ukraine and Poland on top of it.
Who cares that these are independent nations? They were once part of Russia lost to aggressive NATO after all.
It doesn’t sound right. Isn’t it? But why?
That’s where double standards bring you.
I guess you disagree with Russian annexation of Crimea but then based on your very same logic Russia has right to annex not only Crimea which is historically more Russian but all the Ukraine and Poland on top of it.
I have no problem with Russia annexing Crimea. After all, it only became part of the Ukraine, because Khrushchev decided it should be one day. But Poland and the Ukraine were fighting over territory before. Poland was no more aggressive than Ukraine. You never seem to mention the territories the Ukraine took that were parts of Hungary and Romania?
Your philosophy seems to be: 1. Russia is always right. 2. Ukrained is right against every country except Russia. 3. Poland is always wrong. Russia is always right.
I am from the U.S. state of California. What Oblast are yo from?