Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

The obvious hypocrisy regarding abortion aside, what is wrong with “no kill” being the law for animal shelters?


6 posted on 01/16/2020 3:40:27 AM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: southern rock
The obvious hypocrisy regarding abortion aside, what is wrong with “no kill” being the law for animal shelters?

For the same reason unicorns don’t exist.

The No-Kill Myth

10 posted on 01/16/2020 4:38:04 AM PST by MD Expat in PA (No. I am not a doctor nor have I ever played one on TV. The MD in my screen name stands for Maryland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: southern rock
Motive - There's no hypocrisy, animals rights wackoism is a religion that believes animals are sacred and humans evil. That's why abortion is OK but “No Kill” also targets domestic animals which they also want to die. The result is always to tie the numbers of animals in shelters to animal breeding and then ban that. The idea that buying a pet somehow causes an shelter animal to die is embedded in the psyche of many stupid people.

Reality - “No Kill” disregards the services animal shelters provide. One of them is free or low cost euthanasia. As far as stray and abandoned animals go it's only OK for dogs. Adoptable dogs are actually a commodity now and a number of places import dogs for this purpose (I think this should be illegal).
Cats are another story. There are too many stray cats in a number of places and controlling their number is where the euthanasia stats come from .

The propaganda always shows dogs in the pictures. People react to that and give power to animal rights wackos.

12 posted on 01/16/2020 5:55:22 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson