Posted on 01/13/2020 3:14:25 PM PST by nickcarraway
For thousands of years, the Indigenous people of Australia set fire to the land.
Long before Australia was invaded and colonised by Europeans, fire management techniques - known as "cultural burns" - were being practised.
The cool-burning, knee-high blazes were designed to happen continuously and across the landscape.
The fires burn up fuel like kindling and leaf detritus, meaning a natural bushfire has less to devour.
Since Australia's fire crisis began last year, calls for better reintegration of this technique have grown louder. But it should have happened sooner, argues one Aboriginal knowledge expert.
"The bush needs to burn," says Shannon Foster.
She's a knowledge keeper for the D'harawal people - relaying information passed on by her elders - and an Aboriginal Knowledge lecturer at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS).
Much of the ancestral information she shares relates to the bush, says Ms Foster.
"It's the concept of maintaining country - central to everything we do as Aboriginal people. It's about what we can give back to country; not just what we can take from it."
'Naive' techniques of today Country is personified within Aboriginal culture. "The earth is our mother. She keeps us alive," Ms Foster says. This relationship shifts priorities around precautionary burning.
While modern-day authorities do carry out hazard reduction burning, focusing on protecting lives and property, Ms Foster says it's "clearly not working".
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...
Had two fires on the ranch back in 2011, lost damn near half of it. Fourteen square miles of pasture and a few fences was all we lost. The sections we lost were mostly Cedar thickets. Those same pastures are better now than I’ve ever seen them. You need a good burn every now and then.
Naturally when white people in government suggest the same thing, the Eco Nazis protest and shut it down.
White man bad. Black man good.
NYT: Aboriginal Hunters’ Fires Help Restore an Australian Desert (Feb. 8, 2019)
“cultural burns”
So, if it’s a bunch of stone age Ferals burning everything it’s OK.
American Indians did the same thing in Virginia. They burned off the underbrush to expose the game that they hunted and to prevent their enemies from sneaking up on them.
Early Jamestown colonials marveled at how there was a lack of underbrush and how they could gallop their horses across the landscape as a result.
Now uncommon common sense versus today’s institutionally indoctrinated, politically correct, global warming alarmism.
Insights welcome.
Replacing “Learn, baby, learn”, with “Burn, baby, burn”.
It does. The drawback is that aboriginal peoples couldn’t do what we call a controlled burn, since they didn’t have the capacity to control it and the weather knowledge to predict posible changes, so some of the burns they started - which were well meant - could be destructive. So Aussies are attacking them now.
But the principle is correct. We do burns here in Florida, and I was out at a local park a couple of weeks ago where the ranger explained the burn policy and its objectives. It’s partly to protect residential areas and partly to promote healthy plant growth, and they have a multi year plan. Not always easy, even though they’re in constant contact with the weather station, but they’re doing a great job. She’s out there all the time trying to figure out the right location for the fires.
Of course in CA and other wildfire zones, the flake greenie governors don’t permit sensible forest control...even though the Indians probably would have been doing it all along.
Australia has the same problem that California does. The extremists have made sensible land management a crime. I heard that in Australia a home owner was fined $100,000 dollars for cutting a fire break on his property. His home was the only one left standing when fire swept through his neighborhood recently.
Yes. The Yosemite Valley was described as “park like “ by the early White visitors. The natives had been doing controlled burns already.
Shhh, don’t let the libs hear that.
How can we sleep when our beds are burning?
I know for a fact the Ohlone did types of controlled burns in their are aof Northern California.
Yep. They did. When California was covered with oaks the burns were quick and relatively gentle. The grass and underbrush burned and the trees did not, Then there was a light coat of ash to fertilize the ground and encourage regrowth. Also, the fires were not real intense so seeds that were buried were not fried and they would regenerate. Wildlife was generally spared as well. Not now. It's for the children, you know.
Modern Leftists: Not as smart as stone age tribesman.
How can we dance when our earth is turning?
Its like wrapping up common sense fire management in a wrapper that might even sell to Leftists who are otherwise blaming “climate change”—but will still likely blame “climate change” anyway.
“Cultural burns?” Agricultural burns make more sense. Fire decreases harmful bug overpopulation, invasive plants, and provides potassium, calcium, phosphorous, and magnesium. It also raises pH in overly acidic soil.
The biology commies should buzz off and leave farmers alone. And by the way, there has always been an area with fewer fish in the Gulf of Mexico near the Mississippi. Little girl graduates, cease and desist from from trying to rob farmers in states along the Mississippi with moronic juvenile assumptions.
Don’t bring up that bald bonehead. Or his goofball band.
CC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.